Orange County NC Website
> ~ 185 <br />-. <br />ra}~,,. <br />3. .. `.` <br />~• of Aragon r~*~t was present at the meeting although they s,~r~ notified): <br />'• Cannissioner V~iitted +~~ the motion. Vote: Ayes, 2 (Crnmissianers <br />'• Willhoit and Ah.itted); noes, 3 (C~missioners Gustaveson, Walker and <br />• Barnes). The Board *++~d an on-site visit to Aragon Discount <br />• Carpet and this be brought back to the agenda after the visit. <br />'• Fry & Younc~lood-Mr. F~bert Epting, Attorney, reprerented this <br />• fine. Nom. Epting said this was an accountant's exxnr. He said that <br />• his clients had rn~*rha~ the Property in question earlier and this <br />• summer a dispute had arisen with the previous owner and according to <br />• the teTans of the aantract his clients hed told the previous otaner td <br />• sell everything in the store to try to ~llect the aimunt of money. The <br />• settlement was 55,000 for everything. Mr. Epting said both the previous <br />• owner arm his clients knew the contents of the fizm were not worth $19,000. <br />• Cra[missicner Willhoit moved to release $14,480 of the $19,480 valuation . <br />• established by the Tax Office. N3otiori died far lack of a second. <br />• Conmii.ssi:oner Gustavesan moved that NIr. Kelly return to the Heard <br />° with a new recndati.on based on the information presented this eve-iing.; <br />• Ce~missianer Barnes seconded the motic~i. Vote: Ayes. 5: noes. 0. <br />• Ellen Scan Foundation-Mx. Kelly recounted for the Board the prior <br />• events regarding this account. Nir. PIv.].lip Scott, the forner owner <br />• of the AroP~Y and '~ Present Secretary of the Foundation was preser_t <br />to respond to Board questions. I3e stated that he had turned aver the <br />P~p~tY '~ the Foundation on December 31, 1979, and it had only been <br />° used far religious purposes since that timY. The building itself had <br />been used only for church services since ~7anuary 1980, and the land had <br />• been used once for a church function. 7fie Board voiced a consensus that <br />' the question was that of the land, whether or not the 100 acres aratmd <br />' ~ building was exempt for religious purposes. Nix. Laws, Tax Supervisor <br />' xernirided the Hoard of the Union Grove Q-iurch, wherein a house rented out <br />' by the church and 120 acres across the road were taxable because they were <br />' not used exclusively for religious puxpases. Nix. Laws told the Board that <br />' ten acres would be a *'p~..~:able amount of land to attach to the house for <br />religious exemption. Carmissioner 4d~.itted moved to release the house and <br />ten acres of land fran 1980 ad valor~n taxes based on its use as for religious <br />rn~, ~,~.c, Connussioner Gus-tavesca~ seconded the motion. 'Iii Caunty <br /> <br />