Minutes - 19970225 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

John Link said that they have tried to come up with a definition to describe an adverse public health condition that would be functional and something that could be used when situations arise. Ron Holdway, Director of Environmental Health, gave background information as stated in attachment 2. He said that they were looking for something that would be definable. He said that there are three basic criteria for failing wastewater systems that must be met to be defined as an adverse public health condition: (1) The wastewater system would have to be failing and be documented by his department, (2) there would have to be no onsite repair possible or (3) repair would not be recommended. For wells, the criteria would basically be a well that was contaminated with a chemical that would be dangerous or threatening to human health, no repair to work on the well, water not be treatable prior to withdrawal and also there would be no alternate site for a new well. Geof Gledhill said that the Water and Sewer Boundary Task Force appointed a committee to look at the adverse public health issue. Staff from the County and the local governments have been working with this task force. The adverse public health issue fits in with the work of this Task Force because the boundary agreement creates service areas and the definition deals with emergencies in areas outside the service areas for water and sewer. Outside of the service area, generally the rule is going to be that you don't extend public water and sewer. They need to find a way to deal with conditions that are not immediately solvable by a new septic tank or new well. The Task Force has come up with calling these situations "adverse public health conditions". The plan is that if a condition is determined to be an adverse public health condition that the health department will come up with a way to fix the condition if possible and at that point it will become a governmental decision and if it is in the Joint Planning Area it would become a joint governmental decision as to how the emergency will be addressed. Commissioner Gordon spoke as a member of the Water and Sewer Boundary Task Force. She said that the combination of having a new definition and a set of remedies and having the Health Department have this pivotal role to determine the situation and make a recommendation to the governmental board who would make the final decision is a good way to approach this issue. She hopes this agreement will be ready by Spring. Peter Gordon said that the OWASA Board has not discussed this issue. However, when they do have a request for water and sewer they would take this definition into consideration. He feels that this clarifies for them what the County is trying to accomplish. Dan VanderMeer agreed with what Peter Gordon said. He congratulated the County on what they are trying to do. Also, it sounds like the elected officials are taking the responsibility for making the final decision. After a career of 35 years in public health, he cautions the County that they are taking on a huge responsibility because it will be very difficult to make the final call. Anew definition is moving in the right direction. He offered to help the committee in any way possible. Commissioner Crowther asked how the role of decision making would come back to the Board of County Commissioners and Geoffrey Gledhill said that in situations where the public health problem is in interest areas, the remedy would come back to the Board of County Commissioners. There is a range of options or possible remedies that would be available. If the remedy is public sewer, an agreement would