Orange County NC Website
' 4 <br />1 companies have been hired to serve in their companys' best interest. <br />2 He has no problem with a density of twenty homes per mile. <br />3 Ms. Dorrel said that they plan to proceed with the merger and <br />4 want to serve Orange County. However, if the density is unacceptable, <br />5 it puts them in a different position which is uncertain at this time. <br />6 In answer to a question from Commissioner Willhoit, Bob Gwyn <br />7 said that all other counties and municipalities have agreed to this <br />8 resolution with a density of fifteen homes per mile. <br />9 Commissioner Gordon questioned the reasoning for using a <br />10 density of 25 homes during the interim period since no one knows what <br />11 the customer reaction would be if the density was set at twenty homes <br />12 per mile. She suggested doing twenty and seeing if the response would <br />13 be more positive than the cable company predicted. When entering <br />14 franchise negotiations, if 20 homes did not work out, the company could <br />15 present information to the contrary. Ms. Dorrel responded that they <br />16 have lowered the homes per mile from 30 to 25. <br />17 Commissioner Willhoit made reference to the fifteen homes per <br />18 mile in the municipalities with a penetration of .5. If they expect a <br />19 penetration of 35~ in Orange County, he suggested going with 21.4 homes <br />20 per mile as the equivalent. He offered this as a compromise which is <br />21 using the same base as for municipalities. <br />22 Hugh MacEachern, General Manager of CVI said that the <br />23 penetration numbers in Orange County are based on how many homes they <br />24 pass and how many of those people subscribe to the service. The best <br />25 number they can offer is 25. <br />26 Bob Sepe explained the deadline provisions and the <br />27 consequences. If any of the demands made by the Board of County <br />28 Commissioners seem unreasonable, the resolution could be nullified and <br />29 the transfer could be approved by the FCC anyway. If approved by the <br />30 FCC in this manner none of the stipulations in this resolution would be <br />31 valid. <br />32 A motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by <br />33 Commissioner Halkiotis to approve the resolution with a change to #5 as <br />34 stated above and the density stated as 21.4 or more residences per mile <br />35 as stated in the resolution attached to these minutes on pages <br />36 <br />37 VOTE: AYES, 3; NOS, 2 (Commissioners Crowther and Gordon) <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 C. RESOLUTION ADJUSTING UPDATING PERMITTED CABLE RATES <br />41 A motion was made by Commissioner Crowther, seconded by <br />42 Commissioner Willhoit to adopt a resolution/order approving adjustments <br />43 in permitted rates for Cable TV service as stated below: <br />44 ORDER APPROVING ADJUSTMENTS IN BASIC SERVICE RATES <br />45 BASED ON EXTERNAL COSTS <br />46 FCC-1210 <br />47 BY ORANGE COUNTY: <br />48 WHEREAS, on May 25, 1995, Time Warner Cable, d/b/a Cablevision of <br />49 Chapel Hill, filed an FCC-1210 Updating Maximum Permitted Rates form <br />50 for Regulated Cable Services with Orange County. Time Warner's filing <br />51 covers the first quarter of 1995, but also takes into account <br />52 inflationary costs incurred during the period of October 1993 through <br />53 June 1994; <br />54 WHEREAS, cable operators are allowed to recover inflationary costs <br />55 during October 1, 1994 through August 31, 1995, based on inflation <br />56 incurred during October 1, 1993 through June 30, 1994; <br />