Minutes - 19950810 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~ Y 2 Commissioner Willhoit would like to see this within the Chapel Hill/Carrboro planning jurisdiction, joint planning and beyond. However, there is probably very little in the Chapel Hill/Carrboro district that is beyond the joint planning area. Marvin Collins said that much of the data is from within the Joint Planning Area, particularly from Chapel Hill/Carrboro's ETJ. He noted that the closer to the urbanized area, the greater the student generation rates. Commissioner Willhoit asked to see the data for the Rural Buffer and Joint Planning Area including Carrboro's Transitional Area. He said that for the County School district, it would be helpful to see the data for the Hillsborough jurisdiction and thus know which areas are generating students. In answer to a question from Commissioner Halkiotis, Marvin Collins said that no one in the state is using impact fees to finance school construction cost except Orange County. There are many other localities around the country which have adopted impact fees. Many are using sliding scales and have gone through a process similar to what Orange County is doing. Some use a combination of dwelling types and number of bedrooms as a basis for the sliding scale. Some fees are based on square footage in the structure. In answer to a question from Commissioner Halkiotis about relating the impact fee back to student generation rates, Geof Gledhill said that there is a two part test. The one part is a rough-proportionality test where there must be some relationship between the fee and the impact. If a larger fee is charged for a bigger house, then there must be some data that shows that bigger houses generate more children and have more of an impact on schools. That is why these exercises have been done. First, there must be some idea that new housing has an impact on schools and then some idea about what impact different types of housing have on schools before there can be a different fee. It is the difference between a fee and a tax. Commissioner Crowther made reference to the bubble effect about the students in elementary school and asked if this bubble could continue into the middle school and high school. Marvin Collins said that it is "like a wave". It is one of the reasons for reviewing the technical report on an annual basis to see if revisions are necessary. The "wave" effect is one reason why the technical report needs to be revisited to see if it is necessary to adjust the impact fees based on higher or lower student generation rates or construction costs. Commissioner Halkiotis said that there are two sizable developments getting ready to develop in the northern end of the County, with a potential of 200 homes, which could really change the report. Marvin Collins said that is another reason for reviewing the report on an annual basis. Over a two to three year period, single- family dwellings could flatten out and more emphasis given to construction of apartments or condominiums. Such a situation needs to be considered annually in the technical report update.