Orange County NC Website
2 <br />the School Boards for 1995 and that they will talk about standards. His <br />concern is that they will agree on standards, then the citizens will not want <br />to pay for them. He would like the schools to take the lead on this and set <br />the standards together. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that he would like to address aesthetics and <br />what is pleasing to the eye compared to what is practical and affordable. A <br />lot of construction is done with the same blueprint and many counties are using <br />the same plans for elementary schools and have saved money by doing this. He <br />feels they should worry less about aesthetics and get the maximum amount of <br />construction for the least money. <br />Chair Carey said that the focus should be on the issues the commissioners <br />want to address with the school boards. It should be noted that school <br />building costs are affected by community use of the schools as well as their <br />use for after school care, since those functions require additional storage <br />space to allow for flexible use of classrooms. The three boards need to think <br />of the space requirements for functions and come to an agreement on the <br />functions desired. He asked for a facility use report from each school system <br />which shows how many individual classrooms are being used for afterschool <br />programs or community activities. In summary, the County Commissioners want <br />to discuss with the two school systems (1) school functions and school <br />standards, (2) energy consumption, (3) community use of the facilities, (4) how <br />many students are on the waiting list for after school care, and (5) additional <br />sources of revenue to include impact fee and impact tax, with the effect on <br />affordable housing to be addressed. The schools may have other items they want <br />to discuss with the County Commissioners which will be added to this list. <br />Neil Pedersen, Superintendent of Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools, noted <br />that the decision for community use of schools has been left to the individual <br />schools. Some teachers don't want students in their classroom after school and <br />in other schools, the teachers have opened their classroom. <br />With regard to the school bond issue, the total tax increase will be it <br />cents instead of 15. This is because of lower than expected interest rates. <br />There will be additional start-up costs for the new schools yet to open. Also, <br />the County expects an additional 600 students for 1995-96 which will cost in <br />per pupil expense an additional $800,000. <br />In answer to a question from Commissioner Gordon about additional money <br />for the new high school, John Link noted that they have committed the available <br />funds received from sales tax for the new elementary school. <br />Neil Pedersen said that they have conceded that some things will be cut <br />from the original plans for the high school. They are looking at their own CIP <br />to see where they have revenues they can use for this facility. <br />John Link indicated that the CIP will be presented the second meeting in <br />February and at that time he will articulate any choices there may be for <br />additional funding and also any policy choices the County Commissioners may <br />want to consider. <br />With regard to private contributions, Commissioner Willhoit said that the <br />County has the ability to provide the money, all they need is the will. He <br />feels it is appropriate for schools to lobby for private contributions. <br />Chair Carey emphasized that the issue is how to use the available <br />resources more efficiently, not how to raise new sources of revenue. <br />