Browse
Search
Minutes - 19930914
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1993
>
Minutes - 19930914
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2010 4:12:07 PM
Creation date
4/6/2010 4:12:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/14/1993
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br />Amy Tattersall, a Cheeks Township resident and a member of the Commission <br />for Women, spoke in support of this Ordinance. It is in the best interest <br />of the community to have local citizens hearing complaints. <br />In response to an earlier question it was determined that the cost of <br />staffing this commission is approximately $10,000 a year. <br />Linda Carver, a resident and member of the Commission for Women, spoke in <br />favor of the passage of this Ordinance. <br />Betty Ibrahim spoke in opposition to the passage of this Ordinance. The <br />Ordinance would give board new power to a group of citizens who have not <br />been elected. She asked for further documentation of discrimination in <br />the County. <br />Johnny Kennedy, an Orange County resident, spoke against the adoption of <br />this Ordinance. He asked that the Board of Commissioners postpone the <br />adoption of this Ordinance. He believes that another Public Hearing needs <br />to be held at which time presentations by those opposing this Ordinance <br />could be heard. <br />Rev. Tim Kimrey, the first Chair of the Human Relations Commission, stated <br />that without a doubt there is discrimination in Orange County. He urged <br />the adoption of the Ordinance by both the County and the municipalities. <br />It will not solve the problem but it is the right thing to do. <br />John Hartwell, an Orange County resident, spoke in favor of this <br />Ordinance. It does not .intend to make anything illegal that is not <br />already illegal under either State or Federal law. Its purpose is to <br />provide an enforcement pattern by conference, conciliation or persuasion. <br />Other communities do have similar ordinances. He pointed out that the <br />type of speech that is covered by this Ordinance is not just "hateful <br />speech". It is speech that is intended to lead to imminent violent <br />action. <br />Philip Knight spoke in opposition to the passage of this Ordinance. He <br />particularly opposed Article 7. He believes that the Commission would be <br />taking on Judicial and Executive roles without proper controls. He felt <br />that the Ordinance could be changed without citizen's knowledge at a later <br />time. <br />Richard Hammer, an Orange County resident, spoke in opposition to the <br />passage of this Ordinance. He indicated that the only precincts that <br />will be actually covered did not elect any of the Commissioners. He <br />requested that a referendum for citizens in the rural communities be held. <br />Commissioner Willhoit indicated that the rural precincts did, in fact, <br />vote to elect Commissioners who serve on the Board at the present time. <br />Keith Cook, a resident of Cedar Grove Township, spoke in support of the <br />adoption of this Ordinance. Orange County has been listed as one of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.