Minutes - 19930914 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

3 communication of threats and personal confrontation. The defendants appealed this as a First Amendment case. The Court of Appeals stated that only the hostile method of delivery, not the content of the message, can be regulated. Gledhill stated that the Orange County efforts followed the course set out by Justice Scalia. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OR OTHER ELECTED OFFICIALS Council member Andresen asked for clarification on the questions listed below: 1) How many cases are expected to be handled yearly? 2) How many are likely to result in penalties and/or be appealed? What is the financial impact of this Ordinance? 3) How many citizens have appealed Commission rulings? 4) What are the roles of staff and volunteers? 5) What information did the Commission gather during the public hearings about complaints directed at public accommodation and/or employment discrimination? 6) How many businesses would be affected by this Ordinance in the county outside of the municipalities? Andresen indicated that reliance on the dispute resolution process as well as improved access for citizens which would result from the adoption of this Ordinance are commendable. Lewis indicated the scope of the financial impact would be decided by the elected officials. However, federal compensation partially offsets the cost to local communities. Orange County could expect to have between three and twelve cases actually go before an Administrative Law Judge within any given year. She indicated that approximately one hundred fifty (150) employers, employing 15,000 people would be covered under Orange County's jurisdiction. New Hanover County has been pleased with the effect the Ordinance has had in their community. They believe that this is good for both employees and businesses. New Hanover County and its Chamber of Commerce co-host an annual Fair Employment Workshop which greatly helps employers understand the changing laws. They co-host an annual Fair Housing Workshop with the Personnel Director's Association which includes the personnel directors of all major employers. Orange County staff would work closely with Commission members during reasonable cause hearings, however the Commission members would actually be responsible for the hearing. The intake and investigation process would be handled by a trained staff person. There is excellent training available for Commission members. The sections dealing with public accommodations and hate violence complaints would have lesser impact. Training sessions would be made available for both small and larger business in order to inform them of the implications of the Ordinance. Council member Herzenberg asked why county government is exempted from the Ordinance. Gledhill indicated that it is impractical, if not impossible, for the County to police itself.