Orange County NC Website
2 <br />growth and the preservation and protection of agriculture, managed forestry, natural <br />resources and visual resources. The management of growth and the creation of flexibility for <br />property owners are also goals of the study. <br />On November 12, the Committee agreed upon a set of recommendations and presented the <br />package at the public hearing for comment and feedback. A citizen information session was <br />held on November 17 to preview the presentation and answer questions from the public. <br />Sixteen people attended this session. <br />The Committee's recommendations are included in the "Conceptual Guidelines for Rural <br />Orange". A summary sheet of recommendations is also provided. In the package, the Committee <br />recommends two broad administrative actions to implement their findings. <br />1. The Committee recommends the creation of a Rural Character Element of the <br />Comprehensive Plan, as allowed under Section 2 of the Zoning Ordinance. This <br />element would contain the Committee's findings, goals and action strategies and <br />incorporate them into County policy. <br />2. The Committee recommends a series of six development options that serve as a <br />catalyst for the Committee's program, representing ways to encourage rural <br />character protection through flexibility and environmentally-sensitive design. <br />The Committee recommends that these development options be incorporated into the <br />County Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations - with the creation of a <br />Rural Orange Design Guidebook as a resource for rural character-enhancing <br />development. <br />The development styles represent an attempt to expand upon current standards and <br />introduce incentives for using new options which result in open space as a part of the <br />development plan. As a part of the overall strategy, the current zoning density of 40,000 <br />square feet in most rural areas would be changed to a range of densities from 10,000 square <br />feet in a planned community to 200,000 square feet in large-lot development. The base <br />conventional development density would be reduced to 80,000 square feet (1.74 acres). <br />However, density bonuses, the use of private roads, and in some cases, access to water and <br />sewer service would be available to those developments which preserve floodplains, wetlands, <br />natural areas, historic/archaeological sites, farmland, and/or forest land. <br />Proposals are also made for preparing plans for Rural Crossroads and Rural Community <br />Centers, including the active participation of community or area residents. <br />The rural character strategies are presented tonight in concept form as the first step <br />in the process. Approval of these rural character strategies and development options in <br />concept form by the Board of Commissioners will provide the basis for preparation of <br />ordinances and plan amendments to implement the strategies. These amendments will be <br />presented at a subsequent public hearing, along with the Rural Orange Design Guidebook - <br />illustrating how to use and apply the development options to protect rural character. <br />BOB STRAYHORN, a member of the Rural Character Study Committee (RCSC), indicated that <br />he was a resident of the New Hope Community. He mentioned that although he was interested <br />in keeping the rural character of the county, compromises must be made. He indicated that <br />the committee's recommendations offer a way to sell a portion of your land without having to <br />sell all of it to a developer. It should be the owners option as to how they use their open <br />space. Incentives are being offered to the land owner which encourage them to set higher <br />standards for their land. <br />LIVY LUDINGTON stated that she is working with the Triangle Land Conservancy and is a <br />member of the RCSC. She stated that the Rural Character Study Committee realizes that the <br />issues surrounding the use of open space and the concept of a rural village are <br />controversial. They welcome citizen comment and hope that constructive suggestions are <br />offered. <br />