Orange County NC Website
<br />Commissioners referred the case back to the Planning Board to consider new <br />evidence. At the October 19, 1992 Planning Board meeting, they considered <br />this new evidence. The Planning Board found that the new evidence added no <br />more t'o that which had been heard before and recommended that the 200.35' x <br />200' lot be rezoned to EC-5 Existing Commercial. <br />The applicant Wayne Combs stated that when he bought the <br />property, he was told by his attorney that what he planned to do was okay. <br />Barton Lloyd stated that the question is how many cars were <br />stored on this property in 1981 when the Combs' purchased the property. <br />According to aerial photographs there were no cars on this property. If <br />there were cars stored around the ball diamond as indicated then he feels <br />that may justify a rezoning for one-third acre only. He asked the Board of <br />County Commissioners to be very specific in asking Mr. Martin where the <br />cars were on this property in 1981. <br />Kenny Martin spoke in support of this request. He stated that <br />there were 30 cars stored on this property in 1981 around the ball diamond. <br />Robert Smith, Attorney for Wayne and Brenda Combs, stated that <br />the Planning Staff's opposition is solely based on photographs. There has <br />been testimony from numerous witnesses who have made it very clear that <br />cars have been stored on this property for sometime. He noted that the <br />cars cannot be seen from the road or from other adjoining property owners. <br />He asked the Board to approve this rezoning. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis expressed a concern about contamination. <br />Mr. Combs explained that all fluids are drained from the cars. <br />Commissioner Gordon noted that there is no evidence to show that <br />cars were stored on this property in 1981 and if there were cars stored <br />there it would not necessarily constitute a business. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Insko, seconded by Commissioner <br />Halkiotis to close the public hearing. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Insko, seconded by Chair Carey <br />to approve rezoning to EC-5 Existing Commercial the lot referenced that <br />measures 200.35' x 200' based on the findings of the Planning Board as <br />listed on page 5 of the agenda abstract. <br />VOTE: AYES, 2; NOES, 3 (Commissioners Gordon, Halkiotis and Willhoit) <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by <br />Commissioner Gordon to deny the rezoning request based on the conclusions <br />on page 5 and supported by the eight (8) findings listed on pages 2, 3, and <br />4 of the agenda abstract. <br />VOTE: AYES, 2; NOES, 3 (Commissioners Halkiotis, Insko and Carey) <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by <br />Commissioner Insko to reconsider this item based on the findings of the <br />Planning Board. <br />VOTE: AYES, 4; NOES, 1 (Commissioner Gordon) <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Insko, seconded by Commissioner <br />Halkiotis to approve rezoning the lot referenced that measures 200.35' x <br />200' to EC-5 Existing Commercial based on the findings of the Planning <br />Board as listed on page 5 of the agenda abstract. <br />VOTE: AYES, 3; NOES, 2 (Commissioners Gordon and Willhoit) <br />