Orange County NC Website
7 <br />Commissioner Gordon asked that when this item comes back to the <br />Board that it include the minutes from the Health Board discussion on these <br />fees. Commissioner Insko asked that this come back on the Consent Agenda. <br />C. OWASA OIIARTERLY REPORT <br />The OWASA report was given by Katie Kalb. She reported that the <br />Cane Creek Recreation facilities are under construction and scheduled for <br />completion by mid-October. The report was received as presented in the <br />agenda. <br />VIII. ITEMS FOR DECISION - REGOLAR AGENDA <br />A. PHASE II HISTORIC INVENTORY - CONSIILTANT SELECTION <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Chair Carey to <br />approve the recommendation as stated below: <br />(1) employ Dan Pezzoni and Rhonda LaFever to conduct the inventory <br />of historic sites and structures in the remaining <br />unincorporated portions of Orange County, <br />(2) that the consultants be reimbursed for their services in an <br />amount not to exceed $32,000. This amount includes $27,500 for <br />salaries, $2,000 for film and development,and $2,500 for <br />travel/mileage expenses. Funding for these expenses will be <br />covered by a $17,000 State grant and a $15,000 cash match from <br />the County, and <br />(3) that the Chair be authorized to execute a contract, contingent <br />upon staff and attorney review, that incorporates the terms of <br />the approved proposal. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />B. FEATHERWOOD PHASE II - PRELIMINARY PLAN <br />At the August 3, 1992 meeting the Board of Commissioners approved <br />the Preliminary Plan for Featherwood Phase II with a public road. This is <br />being presented for reconsideration because although the agent for the <br />applicant was notified on August 3 that this item was on the agenda for that <br />date, he failed to notify Mr. Veit, the developer. Mr. Veit asked for an <br />opportunity to present his case to the Board. <br />Geoffrey Gledhill explained that the Board can either move to <br />reconsider this proposal or rescind the previous action. In either case, the <br />Board may hear from the applicant before making a decision. <br />The applicant Ms. Laura L. Feather asked that the Board reconsider <br />their action of August 3, 1992 which required that they put in a Department <br />of Transportation standard road rather than the private road that was approved <br />by the Planning Board. She feels the decision by the Planning Board was made <br />by carefully looking at the plan and in accordance with the guidelines for a <br />private road. The road is 300 feet in length with a cul-de-sac and will serve <br />five (5) lots. She expressed a concern that additional trees will need to be <br />removed if a DOT road is required. Ms. Feather went through the private road <br />guidelines commenting about each one. She asked that her situation be <br />reviewed in its totality and that their decision be based on this review. She <br />feels her subdivision meets the standards for a private road and asked that <br />the Board vote in favor of a private road or at least put off the decision <br />until the Board has visited the site. <br />