Orange County NC Website
7 <br />Commissioner Halkiotis stated that he has some serious concerns with <br />respect to_the letter from Mark Taylor to Gayle Wilson dated July 7, 1992 and <br />the implications that-are not true. He feels that if the County can save <br />money and go the less intrusive route that it should be considered.. He <br />stated that the County needs mandatory recycling. The County .Commissioners <br />have a responsibility to the rural citizens on the issue of the landfill and <br />recycling. He strongly supports a composting operation. He will fight to <br />protect people's property so that it is not damaged but will not be <br />responsible and pay for any damage-done to private property. He is against <br />drilling on people's land. <br />Commissioner Willhoit agrees with a composting operation. He is <br />also-concerned about the inconsistencies in the letter and would like to have <br />this cleared up. His understanding of the difference between the test pits <br />and the test borings is that if the borings are grouted correctly, it would <br />not present a-permanent impediment to the development of the land, whereas <br />the test pits and the required setbacks by the .state health regulations are <br />less certain. He suggested that they nat authorize the test pits until that <br />can--be~ verified. He suggested that the Hoard meet with the Landfill Site <br />Search Cammittee because in this entire process there must be a transfer of <br />ownership from the Landfill Site Search Committee to the consultants to the <br />Board. He feels that a lot of the questions have been discussed and the <br />Board members can get a lot of their questions answered at such a meeting. <br />One question is why was site 10 taken off and site 11 left on when they have <br />similar characteristics. Another question is whether the committee process <br />possibly overlooked a site. <br />Chair Carey expressed his concern about the information in the <br />letter that appears to be untrue. His biggest concern is with the impact of <br />the testing and the excavation on the property. He doesn't feel that they <br />have enough information to select just one site for testing as suggested by <br />someone in the audience. He supports a less-intrusive way of testing before <br />using the more intrusive testing that must be done. He would like to be able <br />to exclude some sites before doing more intrusive type testing but he needs <br />more information. <br />Commissioner Insko stated she favors doing less invasive type <br />testing if possible. This may not lead to the elimination of any of the <br />sites but it may. She feels that the Board should take every step possible <br />to get additional information in an effort to eliminate one or more sites. <br />Commissioner Gordon still questions if these are the proper sites <br />to test. She has questions about the process and understanding the criteria <br />used. She questioned the location and -the size. Also, she questions if <br />these are the proper testing procedures and, if not, which procedures should <br />they use. She asked if there is adequate protection for the landowners and <br />should there be compensation for damage. She favors a work session of the <br />Commissioners. She feels it is complicated enough to ask the staff to <br />develop a recommended process for the Commissioners' input in deciding <br />whether it would be helpful to have the Landfill Site Search Committee <br />involved. <br />Commissioner Insko favors a work session with the Landfill Site <br />Search Committee. She would like additional information on how they selected <br />the four sites as well as other information. She would like to have the <br />difference between site 10 and site 11 explained to her. She does not want <br />to take the process away from the Landfill Site Search Committee. There does <br />