Orange County NC Website
JOYCE TENNISON, Frank Porter Graham PTA representative, stated her <br /> strong support for a 66 million dollar bond. <br /> LEON is of the Culbreth PTA, stated that the cost of <br /> school failure s more than the pain of a tax increase. Chapel Hill <br /> schools are very good because of the p <br /> Y g widespread support for them. With <br /> all this support, they have no luxurious schools. Culbreth is already students over capacity. They can ha rdly meet the basic needs of their <br /> schools. The PTA has provided $60,000 in funds to help the <br /> school. Parents put in hundreds of p <br /> p hours to accumulate these funds <br /> because they are proud of their school. They see their school as <br /> something that works. They believe their school is their most important <br /> possession. He asked that the message be spread and asked that the <br /> Board of County Commissioner do the right thing. <br /> MAGGIE SLOAN of Chapel Hill stated she hates paying taxes but <br /> supports a 66 million dollar package to be put before the voters in May. <br /> CINDY CHEEK feels the increased tax is an investment in the future <br /> and a small price to pay to be sure the children get a good education. <br /> KATIE MCLAURIN, Chapel Hill School District, stated that the redis- <br /> tricting done last year can only juggle the number of students for a <br /> limited time. Sufficient infrastructure is needed. Also, the students <br /> need an education that will prepare them for the 21st century. She <br /> asked the Board to approve a bond referendum to allow the school system <br /> to move forward with their educational plans. <br /> DR. JOHN GRAHAM, representing TaxWatch, read a prepared statement <br /> which is in the Permanent Agenda File in the Clerk's <br /> g Office. In <br /> summary, he expressed reservations about the size of the proposed bond, <br /> the lack of evidence of hard planning, vagueness concerning the amount <br /> of money needed and lack of evidence that the proposed construction is <br /> linked to the curricular needs of the next decade. He mentioned several <br /> innovations that could be considered instead of spending money on bricks <br /> and mortar. <br /> WILLIAM OPPOLD, member of TaxWatch, offered to help the schools <br /> with their problems of overcrowding conditions. He stated that there <br /> are other retired individuals who would be willing to help as <br /> volunteers. (His entire letter is in the Permanent Agenda File) <br /> GRAINGER BARRETT, spoke in support of a 66 million dollar bond <br /> issue. He has three children in the school system. He stated that all <br /> children in the County are equal and need this bond package. He will <br /> pay those property taxes for children before he would get a new car. <br /> The need is there. Doors cannot be closed to the children. Maybe year <br /> round schools will come in the future but not now. This bond issue <br /> should not be delayed. He challenged the Board of County Commissioners <br /> to be active and vigorous leaders and be advocates of this bond <br /> referendum. He asked that his friends in Orange County not fight <br /> through the newspaper but meet each other and talk in a retreat and hash <br /> it out and go forward. The main danger is that of delay. In the end <br /> the product is what is important, not the bricks and mortar. <br />