Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
3 <br />1. <br />~. <br />t <br />i <br />I <br />~~7,~ r O <br />on review. Commissioner Gustaveson asked that the twenty year period <br />be scratched. Commissioner Walker noted that this was a fairly routine <br />matter. Commissioner Barnes told Mr. Kline that the Board's intent <br />was to back the ,New Hope Fire Department. <br />Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. <br />1) Commissioner Barnes said there would be a public meeting on <br />April 8th at 8:00 pM at the New Hape building on the subject of tax <br />revaluation. Commissioners Barnes and Whitted, Mr. Ferrell and Mr. <br />Laws would be the panel. <br />2) Commissioner Barnes said the application for Imminent Threat <br />Grant funds for the Efland Estates subdivision had been denied by HUD. <br />She said Mr. McAdams, the engineer for the project,would report to the <br />Board an April 21, 1981. <br />Agenda Item 5: The Planning Board Recommends Policy <br />Concernin Road Construction and Main- <br />tenance Re uirements in Pro ose Sub- <br />ivisions that Will Be Situate On Ex- <br />isting Pub is Roads at Are Not State <br />Maintained. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~~"~ <br />Mr. Polatty, Planning Director, presented the Planning Board's <br />recommendation on public roads that are not state maintained within <br />subdivisions. (see page of this book fora copy of the memo out- <br />lining the recorranendations.) <br />Ms. Betty Eberhardt told the Board she would be affected by any policy <br />which the Board might choose to set on this subject. She said she was <br />buying a piece of property on Sweet Drive which had been carved from two <br />parcels of land. The total frontage of the three lots is 284 feet; her <br />portion is X34 feet. Sweet Drive is one mile long and currer~Gly there are <br />two homes on the three lots; Ms. Eberhardt is planning to build. She <br />said it was silly to require 284' in the center of a road one mile long <br />to be yravelled and the residents couldn't-afford it. There are 30 lots <br />on this road .and highway 57. <br />Mr. .Polatty said the reasoning behind the Planning staff recommendation <br />was that those who benefitted should pay for the upgrading. <br />Commissioner Willhoit moved that option 1 should be applied in this <br />particular case and that the planning staff should take other requests <br />2. <br />3• <br />~• <br />5. <br />6. <br />7• <br />$- <br />~_._ q. <br />1Q. <br />~.x. <br />12. <br />13. <br />A <br />7.s. <br />9 (a ~ <br />a7. <br />~.~, <br />.'.~. <br />;n, <br />2?_ . <br />23. <br />?~. <br />2 ~. <br />25. <br />?7. <br />28. <br />^a~ <br />30. <br />~~z. <br />~? <br />.~ <br />-- <3p <br />i <br />i 34• <br />35. <br />r <br />C 36. <br />37. <br />~!~j . <br />~~ % N <br />1 <br />1.}~ C <br />