Agenda - 04-06-2010 - 7c - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Judith Wegner: If you would prefer to offer a motion to take no action I think that would lay on the table for another day which would mean all 2 5 that would go ahead if that passed that would trump over Earl's motion in which case the record would go forward. MOTION made by Earl McKee to approve Option 3 to include a stub out between lots one and hvo with that stub out consisting of a 60 foot right of way shall be provided to the southern boundary including all the conditions listed with the exception of Condition number 9 and with an amendment to number 8. Seconded by Tommy McNeill. Vore: Passed; 5 yes; 4 no (Wright, Marcoplos, Wegner, Hallenbeck) Brian Crawford: I would like to thank the public for coming. Brian Crawford: We do a disservice to folks by not allowing them to speak. That is my own opinion. We will try not to let that happen again. Judith Wegner: In the future, we can ask them before Robert gets up. Tina Love: Let's give them instructions next time. I need to know who was present for the meeting in addition to those who spoke. It is a little different than the process for the public hearings. Judith Wegner: What about at the end of the public charge? Maybe you could remind us. I really think it did everyone a disservice when the recommendation said planning staff does not recommend approval of Option 3 and then to try to have it in the record that they did but it was the only one left. I felt let down by what we were given from staff. I would also say I don't feel we got an adequate workup on Option 3 that was evidence to be in front of us. You may not have known until you got the letter from the attorney but you were doing well to talk to the attorney. I find it confusing if there is not that type of workup. Tommy McNeill: Robert, I think you did an excellent job in answering the questions and keeping the Planning Board aware of the process as welt as what the recommendations from staff were. That kepi me focused. What we should focus on instead of all of our personal intuitions regarding the project so I thank you for that.