Orange County NC Website
5 <br /> 1 Donna Baker said that she would use the subcommittee to help with the attendance <br /> 2 process. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 A motion was made by Commissioner Pelissier, seconded by Commissioner <br /> 5 Jacobs to ask the internal advisory boards to come up with a work plan every year, and <br /> 6 then at the end of the year, to tell the Board of County commissioners what has been <br /> 7 accomplished with a summary. commissioner Jacobs amended the motion that the <br /> 8 work plan should be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Board of county <br /> 9 Commissioners. <br /> 10 Commissioner Yuhasz said that he is concerned about heading off some good ideas <br /> 11 from advisory boards. Commissioner Jacobs said that "consistent with" is not the same as <br /> 12 "parroting". <br /> 13 - Frank Clifton said that all advisory boards need to understand that they are advisory <br /> 14 boards and the Board of County Commissioners is seeking input. <br /> 15 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Chair Foushee made reference to page 12 (Advisory Board actions for consideration-at <br /> 18 the top), which was the list of advisory boards with potential changes. Frank Clifton reiterated <br /> 19 that these are "potential" changes. <br /> 20 Commissioner Gordon asked if the public would be involved in this process. <br /> 21 Chair Foushee said that the subcommittee found it difficult to move forward because <br /> 22 there was not a process. She said that none of this should be done without public input. <br /> 23 Frank Clifton said that some of his recommendations may take a year or more. He said <br /> 24 that where the boards have been created by resolution, they would have to be changed by <br /> 25 resolution. <br /> 26 Commissioner Yuhasz that some of these boards were discussed at the last retreat. He <br /> 27 said that before the County Commissioners make any decisions, they need to allow the <br /> 28 advisory boards to make some recommendations back as to their charge and if it is worthwhile <br /> 29 to continue with each boardlcom mission. <br /> 30 Commissioner Pelissier said that she does not want to ask every board what they think <br /> 31 their function is, but she would like to flag the ones that could be merged together. she wants <br /> 32 to know the pros and cons of the potential changes. <br /> 33 Commissioner Jacobs said that there is an argument that the Visitor's Bureau could be <br /> 34 spun off as a separate entity, but he wants to know the pros and cons. He made reference to <br /> 35 an email from the Commission for Women about the cons of having a non-profit take over the <br /> 36 role of operating the Commission for Women. He said that this was very useful. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Chapel Hill/orange County Visitors Bureau: <br /> 39 Commissioner Jacobs said that the County Commissioners should pose to the bureau <br /> 40 the question of whether it is not time for the Visitors Bureau to consider being an autonomous <br /> 41 entity and the pros and cons of that. <br /> 42 Frank Clifton said that he made this recommendation because there are two separate <br /> 43 hotel/motel taxes authorized and collected in Orange County. One goes to promote hotel/motel <br /> 44 tourism and the other one goes to support recreational services. He suggested partnering with <br /> 45 the other entity that has a hotel/motel tax (Chapel Hill) and equally sharing the costs of <br /> 46 promotion. <br /> 47 Commissioner Nelson said that this issue of Chapel Hill keeping part of these taxes for <br /> 48 other purposes is pretty significant. He suggested sending a letter to the Town Council asking <br /> 49 them to designate 100% of those funds for tourism. <br />