Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-06-2010 - 4a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 04-06-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 04-06-2010 - 4a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2015 2:52:43 PM
Creation date
4/1/2010 2:34:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/6/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-06-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> 1 Planning Director Craig Benedict made a PowerPoint presentation and made an <br /> 2 introduction of the notices. He said that for the people that received a p ost card, there will be no <br /> 3 changes to their land. of the other people that were noticed, about ago eo le were notified <br /> p p <br /> 4 that they could be potentially included in the new critical area and about 300 eo le were <br /> p p <br /> 5 notified that they would be excluded based on the new definition. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Upper Eno Watershed Critical Area Amendments <br /> 8 [quarterly Public Hearing <br /> 9 February 22, 2010 <br /> 10 <br /> 11 What's Being Proposed? <br /> 12 - Zoning ordinance Text Amendments <br /> 13 o Criteria used to designate Critical Area <br /> 14 o Definitions <br /> 15 - Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments <br /> 16 o Ensure consistency <br /> 17 - Zoning Atlas (map) and Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Ma p Amendments <br /> 18 o Depiect new definitions/criteria with a redefined overlay map <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Why change? <br /> 21 - Efland-Mebane Small Area Plan calls for re-evaluation of Seven Mile Creek area <br /> 22 - Zoning ordinance Text and Atlas need to match <br /> 23 o Present Atlas does not match text in some areas <br /> 24 o Can lead to disputes <br /> 25 - Potential reservoirs protected in 1994 are no longer suggested <br /> 26 - Focused economic development growth areas <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Proposed Criteria <br /> 29 - Based on straight-fine distances: <br /> 30 o From normal pool elevations of reservoirs (Class I and Class II) <br /> 31 o From centerline of third order and higher streams for a specified distance <br /> 32 - Excludes areas designated as "Transition Areas" (i.e., growth areas) on the <br /> 33 Comprehensive Plan Land use Element Map <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Rationale for change <br /> 36 - Town of Hillsborough has built its West Fork reservoir. Future Phase If is permitted <br /> 37 - No plans by Town or County for additional reservoirs so delete language <br /> 38 - Clarify that there are State-Required and County-Designated Critical Areas (same <br /> 39 regulations—density, lot size, impervious surface) <br /> 40 - Removes from "critical Area" designation lands in Efland area designated for <br /> 41 growth/economic development <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Why change? (continued) <br /> 44 - Continue to protect: <br /> 45 o Water quality <br /> 46 o Headwaters <br /> 47 o Fragile water supply <br /> .48 o Groundwater resources <br /> 49 o Aquatic environments <br /> 50 - Remove text-map Conflicts <br /> 51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.