Browse
Search
2010-032b Planning - Contract Professional Services Related to Orange County Unified Development Ordinance
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Contracts and Agreements
>
General Contracts and Agreements
>
2010's
>
2010
>
2010-032b Planning - Contract Professional Services Related to Orange County Unified Development Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2018 8:29:29 AM
Creation date
3/29/2010 11:23:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contract
Date
3/2/2010
Contract Starting Date
3/2/2010
Contract Ending Date
12/17/2010
Contract Document Type
Agreement - Services
Agenda Item
4l
Amount
$30,000.00
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-02-2010 - 4l
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 03-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 30-3:Zoning Districts <br /> Section E Business Base Zoning Districts <br /> Subsection 4:Community Commercial(CC)District <br /> 4. COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL(CC) DISTRICT <br /> • <br /> The Community Commercial(CC)District is established and intended to accommodate a <br /> diverse range of medium-to high-intensity retail,service,and office uses that provide goods and <br /> services serving the residents and businesses in the community at large---e g.,shopping centers, <br /> convenience stores,retail sales establishments,and heavier commercial uses(subject to approval <br /> • of a Special Use Permit(See Section 30-2.<>.)). The district is typically located along major <br /> • • arterials,at the intersection of arterials,and along growth corridors identified in city plans. <br /> Higher-density residential uses are encouraged on the upper floors of nonresidential <br /> 0 establishments,and may exist as stand-alone buildings as part of a larger horizontal mixed-use <br /> development The district is subject to standards intended to ensure development is compatible <br /> with surrounding uses as well as the design standards in Article 30-5:Development Standards. _ <br /> Lot area,min.(sq ft) 10,000 8,000 15,000 n/a <br /> Lot width,min.(ft) 45 n/a <br /> Gross residential density,max n/a 16 12 n/a <br /> (dwelling units/acre)[1] <br /> Lot coverage,max(%of lot area) 65 [2] <br /> 25; 15 where abutting a <br /> Height,max(ft) 65 single-family zoning district <br /> or use <br /> Front and corner side setback, 25;60 ft from street centerline <br /> min.(ft)[3] Not allowed in front,corner <br /> Side setback,min.(ft)[3] 3; 15 where abutting a single-family zoning district or use side,or side yard areas <br /> Rear setback,min.(ft)[3] 3;20 where abutting an alley or single-family zoning district or use 20 <br /> Spacing between buildings,min. 20 n/a 5 <br /> (ft) <br /> Zero lot line development shall comply with the applicable maximum gross residential density <br /> Zero lot line development standards. Setbacks for lots abutting the perimeter of the development shall meet the district <br /> minimums;otherwise no setbacks,lot area,lot coverage,or building spacing requirements shall <br /> apply. <br /> Open Space Set-Aside(%of Residential uses: :Nonresidential and mixed-uses:[to be determined in Module 3] <br /> parcel size) <br /> NOTES:[I]Gross residential density may be increased by up to 10 percent for development located within an"incentive area"as <br /> identified on the official zoning map. <br /> [2] Accessory structuresluse areas shall not exceed the lesser of 1,500 square feet in size or 30%of the allowable lot coverage. <br /> [3] Minimum setbacks for nonresidential,multi-family,and mixed-uses shall be increased by five feet for all building walls 25 feet or <br /> more above grade_ <br /> ss The CC district combines the C I,C I P,and C3 district regulations. None of the current districts include a minimum lot size standard,minimum <br /> lot width,maximum lot coverage,or height We have suggested an approach that allows heights up to 65 feet,subject to additional design standards <br /> will also apply that relate to contextual heights,roof forms,and"step backs"towards shorter strvcuues. The setbacks have been reduced from the <br /> C I district requirements to limit the creation of nonconformities. <br /> June 2009 City of Fayetteville,North Carolina <br /> Page 3-25 Unified Development Ordinance—Module Two Public Review Draft(REVISED) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.