Browse
Search
2010-032 Planning - Professional Services Related to the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Contracts and Agreements
>
General Contracts and Agreements
>
2010's
>
2010
>
2010-032 Planning - Professional Services Related to the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2018 9:16:42 AM
Creation date
3/29/2010 11:22:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contract
Date
3/2/2010
Contract Starting Date
3/2/2010
Contract Ending Date
12/17/2010
Contract Document Type
Agreement - Services
Agenda Item
4l
Amount
$30,000.00
Tags
6-year Retention
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-02-2010 - 4l
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 03-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
R 2010-032 Planning - Clarion Associates
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\Contract Routing Sheets\Routing Sheets\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 30-3:honing Distri*cts <br /> Section D:Residenual Base Zoning Dal cts <br /> Subs e�tian 6:Singe-Family Remdential 6(SF-6)District <br /> 6. SINGLE=FAMILY RESIDENTIAL b (SF-6) DISTRICT <br /> The S K&dential 6(SF-6)District is established and intended to accommodate principally <br /> � single-family detached residential development at moderate denski es,that�s designed to respond to <br /> environmental and site conditions. It also accommodates two�-to fourmfamily dwellings and Zara lot <br /> line development subject to the requirements of this Ordinance. All uses in the district are subject to <br /> � the design standards in Art��ie 3D-5:Development Standards.District regulations d�scour�aRge any use <br /> ■ ■ that substantially interferes with the development of single-family dwellings and that is detrimental to <br /> � the quiet residential nature of the district Also allowed are complementary uses usually found in <br /> residential zoning districts,such as parks,open space,minor utilities,accessory dwellings,schools,and <br /> places of worship. <br /> It a I B-7111 I a ow IL <br /> AIMIL <br /> ■ r <br /> Lot area per unit,min.(sq ft) 6900D 5,50000 5,61000 nla <br /> Lot width,min.(ft) 60 �a <br /> Gross residential density,max. 9,6; 10.9 far zero dot line development nla <br /> (dwelling unitslaa-e)[2] <br /> Lot coverage,max 40 <br /> (%of fat area <br /> 25; IS where abutting a <br /> Height,max(ft) 35 single-family zoning <br /> district or use <br /> Front and corner side setbadk, 50 from street centerline Not allowed in front, <br /> min.(ft)[3] side,or corner side <br /> Side setback min. 10 setbacks <br /> Rear setback,min.(ft)[3] 30-, 15 when corner side setback is 75 or more 5 <br /> Spacing,between buildings min. �� 2p S <br /> (ft) <br /> Zara lot line development must he on a site or trait of 40,000 square feet or more,shall Damply <br /> with the maximum gross residential density standards,and shall require a special use permit(See <br /> Zero lot line development Section 30-2.3.c>)when proposed an a dot or site smaller than three acres in a developed portion of <br /> the city. Setbacks for fats abutdng the perimeter of the development shall meet the district <br /> minimums;otherwise no setbacks,lot a.r'ea,lot coverage,or building spacing requirements shall apply. <br /> Qpen Space Set Aside of <br /> Resideitia�!uses: :Nonresideltial and mixed-uses:[to be determined in Module 3] <br /> parcel size} <br /> VPEPq <br /> 50 The SF-6 district carries forward many of the R6 district"sions with a few exceptions.The current pro"stons do not include any density <br /> requirements,but one is-added(9.G DU/acre)-,and is sub*t to the denselty rounding srtandards discussed'm earlier footnotes. The current standards <br /> allow detached dwellings,zero tat line,and condominium developments to use a sliding scale for minimum tat sot where lot sire may be reduced to <br /> as small as 4,000 square feet per unrt as the number-of units increase. We have revised this aP3xoach by holding dot size Constant for detached <br /> dwellings,allvwing attached residential and two-to four-firifily dwelfi on SAW square foot lots. In terms of zero lot line development each <br /> development is required to have 40,000 square feet in develo ent see,and the lot area requiremerts are removed in favor of density limitations. <br /> Lot coverage imitations are increased from 359 to 4Q%to fteffitate infill(subject to new design standards. finally,die di ct now includes a 10 <br /> percent dermiq bonus for new development occurring within d "incentive areas". <br /> June 20f]'9 pity of FayetteVille,North Carolina <br /> Page 3dw 1 5 Unified Development Ordinance--Module Two Public Review Craft(REVISED) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.