Minutes - 19801209 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

from the Proposed Zoning Ordinance. The County Attorney expressed his opinion that the Board would neither weaken nor strenghten its police power by the exclusion or inclusion of that word. Commissioner Walker voiced concern over the lack of support for the Proposed Zoning Ordinance from Cheeks Township. Chair Barnes asked Mr. Polatty what the Cheeks Township Advisory Council thought about the Pro- posed Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Polatty said that the Proposed Zoning Ord- inance reflected very closely the desire of the Cheeks Township Advisory Council. Chair Barnes noted the presence of a representative to the Cheeks Township Advisory Council, Mr. David Shanklin, and requested his evaluation of the situation. Mr. Shanklin replied that the Proposed Zoning Ordinance did indeed reflect the feelings of the Cheeks Township Advisory Council. He thought the public needed to be accurately informed of what the Zoning Ord- contained and then they would concur with the Cheeks Township Advisory Council. In response to a question from Chair Barnes, Mr. Polatty stated the meetings with the Cheeks Township Advisory Council had been advertised. Mr. Shanklin then asked the Board if Cheeks Township could be deleted from the Proposed Zoning Ordinance until they had further meetings on it, in order to prevent the Proposed Zoning Ordinance from being unduly delayed due to dissension in Cheeks Township. Chair Barnes replied that the Board would rely on the •recommendations of the Planning Board. Article 2 There was no dissension and the Board did not indicate any recommendation to the Planning Staff. Article 3 There was no dissension and the Board did not indicate any recommendation to the Planning Staff. Article 4 There was no dissention and the Board did not indicate any recommendation . to the Planning Staff. Article 5 Commissioner Walker asked Mr. Cannity if one had to have a minimum set- back of 150 feet on a lot of record. Mr. Cannity replied not if it was a lot of record and the landowner did not have sufficient contiguous property