Minutes - 19801124 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

2. i 3. John Cates, Highway 70, Hillsborough: (Mr, Cates owns property 5 in Eno, Bingham, Hillsborough and Cheeks Townships) Mr. Cates said 6. that signs bring money into Orange County from the Interstate and we 7- should not ban signs on the Interstate. 8_ Mr. Lloyd: Spoke for Flavorich. He said Flavorich has several 9* signs on the Interstate and it would be ridiculous to have the signs 10. removed. 11. Ms. Barbour: Said Section 9.8 is too restrictive regarding a 12. real estate signs. 13. Mr. Allen: He does not think signs are dangerous. He thinks the 1!}. Board should rid the County of liquor signs but keep the milk and 15. soft drink signs. 16. This concluded comments on Article 9 of the proposed Zoning Text. 17. ARTICLE 10 is. There were no comments about Article 10. 19. ARTICLE 11 20, Don Sulbreth (?), Wildcat Creek Subdivision: Mr. Sulbreth 21. said as he understood this Article, some of the lots in Wildcat Creek 22. would. be in non-compliance with the proposed Zoning Ordinance. 23. RAnda U Wad: Mr. Waugh addressed Sections 11.6 and 11.7; he 24. thinks the Ordinance takes away existing property rights and uses 25. which predate the Ordinance and limits the replacement of non-con- 26. forming stuctures. He expressed his displeasure with these Sections 27. of Article 11 and stated that Section 7 was discriminatory. 28. Mr. Lloyd: Thinks that one should be permitted to rebuild a 29. non-conforming structure that has been destroyed but not to enlarge 30. or expand that structure. 31. Ms. Barbour: In reference to Section 11.4, said that there should not be a limit placed on the amount one could spend repairing or 32. 33. maintaining non-conforming structures. This concluded the comments on Article 11 of the proposed Zoning 34- 35. Text. 36. 37. 38, 39, '