Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
lu <br /> i. M <br /> 3. <br /> were consulted. <br /> 5. Ms. Barbour: Referred to page 2-9, Section 2.3.3.7 and commented <br /> 6. that there no statement as to how long after the Board received an <br /> 7. appeal that it, had to render a decision. She suggested that this <br /> 8. section be clarified as to exactly how much time was required. She <br /> 9. voiced her concern about the public interest being placed above <br /> 10. private interest. <br /> 11. . This concluded the comments about Article 2 of the Zoning Text. <br /> 12. ARTICLE 3 <br /> 13. There were no comments regarding Article 3 of the Zoning Text. <br /> 114. . ARTICLE 4 <br /> 15. Mr. Lloyd: He asked why there was no sewage or water service <br /> 16. to the Efland area. He requested that more study be devoted to the <br /> 17. 10-20 years projection stated in this Article for the extension of <br /> 18. • such services into the Efland area. In reference to page 4-10, he <br /> 19. suggested the Eno River State Park be deleted from this Section and <br /> 20. considered a potential water source. <br /> 21. Ms. Barbour: Wanted to know, in reference to page 4-4, Section <br /> 22. 4.2.8.b.1, if Carrboro was the only area where such a local commercial <br /> 23. district exists. She also asked, in reference to page 4-7, "why do <br /> 2�. such "economic development" districts have to be near the Federal <br /> 25. Interstate Highway system? Ms. Barbour expressed concern regarding the <br /> 26. elimination of the Eno River State Park from consideration as a potential <br /> 27. dam site. <br /> 28. Ed Copeland, Route 2, Efland: Mr. Copeland asked how many present <br /> 29. were on the Planning Board. (There was a show of hands from members <br /> present.) He then stated that he lived in a area where the soil won't <br /> 30• <br /> pass the perk test and asked the Planning Board how they could zone <br /> 31. <br /> this land for homes when the water won't perk. <br /> 32. <br /> This concluded the comments on Article 4 of the Zoning Text. <br /> 33. <br /> ARTICLE 5 <br /> 3l.. <br /> Mr. Biermannn: Mr. Biermann thinks it is unwise to adopt a <br /> 35. <br /> "land use intensity system" for rural Orange County. He said these <br /> 36. <br /> systems were designed for use in heavily populated areas and simply <br /> 37. <br /> 38. <br /> 39. <br />