Browse
Search
ORD-2008-069 - Proposed Animal Ordinance Amendment on the Tethering of Dogs
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2008
>
ORD-2008-069 - Proposed Animal Ordinance Amendment on the Tethering of Dogs
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 11:17:17 AM
Creation date
3/11/2010 3:20:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/20/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-20-2008-5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 05-20-2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 <br />Kay Bishop, DVM, New Hope Animal Hospital <br />Ken Redmond, Vine Veterinary Hospital <br />Kathy Crabtree, DVM, Carver Street Veterinary Hospital <br />Pat Pagel, DVM, Cole Park Veterinary Hospital <br />Michelle Droke, DVM, Cole Park Veterinary Hospital <br />Deborah Stein, DVM, Cole Park Veterinary Hospital <br />Megan Hams, DVM, Cole Park Veterinary Hospital <br />Marjorie Undeke, DVM, St. Francis Veterinary Hospital' <br />Timmy Frazier said that he has tried to make all of these meetings and has tried <br />to talk to people in the community, especially those in the northern part of the County. <br />He said that he is a responsible dog owner, and he believes that tethering is okay if the <br />owner takes care of his/her dogs and tethers in a humane way. He thinks that the <br />problem in Orange County is the dog breed. He said that when the County <br />Commissioners force something like this amendment down their throats, it makes the <br />citizens mad. <br />Susan Kelly is against the tethering amendment. She agreed with Commissioner <br />Carey and they all want to do the right thing for the animals. For some, she thinks that it <br />could be tethering. <br />Stillman Wright was bom and raised in Chapel Hill. He said that he has tethered <br />champion dogs and his dogs are not mistreated. He showed pictures of his dogs. His <br />dogs are kept on ten foot chains, which give them 365 square feet. He said that he is a <br />responsible dog owner. He also showed a picture of an American Pit Bull Terrier that <br />got out of a fence. <br />Josh Chapman was bom and raised in Orange County. He read from an article <br />from the News and Observer. °Barbara Sherman, a Clinical Associate Professor at N. <br />C. State University College of Veterinary Medicine, said `method of animal confinement <br />should not be blamed for neglect. You can abuse those same dogs by putting them in <br />tiny pens. We really need to examine the welfare of each dog." He asked those that <br />live in Orange County and that have dogs that live on chains to raise their hands. He <br />said that most people who raised their hands are from Orange County. He said that <br />most of the people that are pushing this are from Chapel Hill and are not going to be <br />affected by this. He said that he has dogs on chains at his house, and they will not stay <br />in pens. <br />Frank Tilley is opposed to the tethering ordinance. He said that there are <br />surveys that say that dogs on chains become aggressive. He has seen plenty of <br />aggressive dogs in pens. He has trained dogs for 12 years and you can make any dog <br />aggressive and it is not just because it is on a chain. A dog can be happy on a chain just <br />as much as he is in a pen. <br />Suzanne Roy was a member of the Tethering Committee and the ASAB. She <br />would like to answer any of their questions rather than referring it back to the Tethering <br />Committee. She said that neglected dogs can be anywhere, but there are special <br />circumstances that make tethering an issue that should be a policy decision — lack of a <br />barrier, protecting the people from the dog, etc. She said that it is a situation similar to <br />having an uncovered or unfenced pool. It is both a lure and a danger to children. She <br />said that 175 children in the last four years have been killed or injured by chained dogs. <br />She made reference to the people that would have to make changes if this ordinance is <br />passed, and she said that these were people that the Tethering Committee had in mind <br />when it recommended the 18 -month phasing period. Regarding the hunting committee, <br />there are very strongly held beliefs against government regulation related to animal <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.