Browse
Search
ORD-2008-069 - Proposed Animal Ordinance Amendment on the Tethering of Dogs
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2008
>
ORD-2008-069 - Proposed Animal Ordinance Amendment on the Tethering of Dogs
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 11:17:17 AM
Creation date
3/11/2010 3:20:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/20/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-20-2008-5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 05-20-2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Frances Jones is a lifetime citizen of Orange County. She said that she has never <br />seen the Chair disrespect citizens as he has tonight. She applauded the hunters for standing <br />up for their rights. The hunters have a right to do what they are doing. She said that dogs in <br />Chapel Hill are treated better than Fairview Community citizens because they have parks with <br />trails. Fairview has been begging for a park for the last 30 years. She said that they are going <br />to do what they have to do to get that park. She said that most of the money in the County <br />goes to Chapel Hill. This is why people feel divided. The Fairview citizens feel that the County <br />thinks more of the dogs in Chapel Hill than it does the citizens. She said that the County <br />Commissioners need to do what they were voted in to do. <br />Bobby Kirk said that he has several good ideas, and the big one is education. He said <br />that there are only six ordinances nationwide that dictate kennel size. He said that he trains <br />over 60 dogs a year, and he travels the nation in field trials. He has a dog coming in tomorrow <br />that is 75 pounds and is a biter. The first thing he will do with this dog is put him on a tether. <br />He said that his dogs are happy on tethers. He agrees that everything has to be done right. <br />He said that every dog is different and tethering is a great thing for a dog. He urged the <br />County Commissioners to vote against this. He said that it would solve no problems and there <br />is no way that it could be enforced. <br />Loren Hart said that he is in support of the dog ordinance. He said that dogs and other <br />animals are individual beings, can feel pleasure, pain, fear, and loneliness. For these reasons, <br />he believes that tethering dogs for prolonged periods is a form of abuse that should be <br />stopped. It is a different kind of abuse than kicking a dog, but it is a form of neglect. He thinks <br />that the current ordinance should be amended to mandate a higher level of care owed to the <br />dogs by their human guardians. He said that he is a resident of Orange County and he works <br />at UNC. He made reference to his uncle who died recently, and said that, in addition to being <br />a veteran of the U. S. Navy, he was also an avid duck hunter, a charter member of the <br />Migratory Waterfowl Hunters and Ducks Unlimited. He remembers fondly fishing with his <br />uncle, but he never hunted with him. He said that he used to eat fish, deer, and other animals, <br />but he does not anymore because he thinks that it is wrong to do so. He still respects his <br />uncle and everyone in this room, but he disagrees with animal exploitation. For the past five <br />years he has chosen a vegetarian diet because of the interests of animals. He thinks that this <br />mindset would be helpful in looking at this ordinance. He made reference to the comments <br />about tyranny and said that we all have rights and we all want to be free, but there is not <br />unlimited freedom. The freedom ends somewhere. He said that animals have interests and it <br />is not just about humans. <br />Kevin Young is a dog owner and breeder and he asked the Board of County <br />Commissioners to use common sense. He asked the County Commissioners to look at the <br />safety issue. He asked where the supervision was of the children who were killed by dogs. He <br />made reference to the breeding that happens and said that the leash laws need to be <br />enforced. Regarding cleanliness, when it rains with a dog in a pen, it causes a multitude of <br />problems. He said that this is not seen with a dog on a tether. He suggested using a body <br />harness to tether a dog so that there would not be embedding of collars. If the dogs were <br />taken care of, then there would not be a problem of embedded collars. He said that education <br />is very important. <br />Diane Genteel said that she spoke before. She said that the issues of aggression, <br />socialization, pet overpopulation, etc. will not be remedied by this law and it is a question of <br />education. Tethering is not the culprit; its the inappropriate use of tethering. She said that a <br />dog on a ten -foot chain has more liberty than it would have in a ten -foot pen. <br />Michael Kirk made reference to one of the committee members who is the North <br />Carolina Director of In Defense of Animals, and said that he is afraid of what will be next with <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.