Browse
Search
ORD-2008-069 - Proposed Animal Ordinance Amendment on the Tethering of Dogs
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2008
>
ORD-2008-069 - Proposed Animal Ordinance Amendment on the Tethering of Dogs
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 11:17:17 AM
Creation date
3/11/2010 3:20:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/20/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-20-2008-5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 05-20-2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of dogs chained and those not chained, suggesting that chaining was not likely to have been <br />the result of aggressive behavior." <br />Deanna Rowan is a resident of Orange County. She supports this ordinance <br />amendment. She said that this is not an animal rights agenda issue; it is a humane treatment <br />of dogs' issues. She said that no one wants to take away anyone's right to have dogs and to <br />hunt. The concern is how the dogs are being kept. She said that the first part of her life was <br />spent in Georgia and Alabama where hunting is a way of life, and she had a lot of close friends <br />that had hunting dogs, and none of them were chained or tethered. She said that this is not <br />about the hunters, but about the hundreds of dogs in Orange County that are chained 24/7, <br />exposed to elements, rarely contacted by their owners, and are subjected to abuse and <br />neglect. <br />Kitty Lynn said that she has rescued hundreds of dogs. She said that chained dogs <br />often become aggressive and territorial for a lack of love and nutrition. They will attack <br />children who enter their territory. She read the names of some children that have been killed <br />or injured by dogs all over the United States. She said that more and more communities are <br />passing laws that regulate the practice of tethering animals, and Orange County will not be the <br />first. She read the names of some cities that have done this. She spoke in favor of the <br />ordinance amendment. <br />Phillip Pennell said that his feelings run deep on this issue. He said that, from the list of <br />children read by Ms. Lynn, there were only a few that were killed by tethered dogs. He said <br />that Person County has a dangerous breed law that Orange County needs to have to contain <br />these types of dogs. He said that he has searched and not once has a hound ever inflicted <br />wounds, but they were mostly from dangerous breeds. He brought out a chain to show the <br />County Commissioners what the Orange County law is with a ten -foot chain. He said that a <br />ten -foot chain would allow 400 square feet of movement, versus 100 square feet with a ten - <br />foot pen. He read from the summary from the Tethering Committee: "Of particular concern <br />are dogs that spend their lives tethered as they are naturally active and social, being that <br />required exercise and frequent interaction with humans and other animals." He said that a ten - <br />foot cage is restricting the dog from exercise. He said that when you take the sociality out of a <br />dog, it makes them mean. He said that he has owned hundreds of dogs, and he has always <br />taken very good care of them. He does not appreciate people coming in and trying to say that <br />chains make bad dogs. <br />Tommy Frazier said that he has dogs and they are better off on a chain than in a pen. <br />He said that it is cleaner to have a chain than a pen. He said that the citizens pay taxes on <br />dogs and there should not be a law. <br />George Painter said that he is opposed to this becoming a law and if the ones on the <br />book now were enforced, there would not be a problem. He said that Ms. Modlin was trying to <br />do a good thing in Scotland County, but he pointed out that she said that those that do not <br />agree with the law are those whose dogs are not well taken care of. He said that when the <br />committee was formed, the Board of County Commissioners asked that there be members on <br />both sides of the argument. The one person that was against it was not allowed to be on the <br />committee. He said that he attended the first open meeting for comment, and two people from <br />his group volunteered to fill the vacant position of someone that was in favor of tethering. This <br />was denied. He said that the whole study was done by those who wanted this amendment <br />passed. He said that the Board of County Commissioners needs to restudy this and put some <br />people on the committee that are on the other side of the issue so that it is fair. <br />Mark Soloman said that he supports this ordinance for several reasons. The first is <br />public safety. Chaining dogs contributes to aggression and constitutes a public safety threat. <br />He said that it has been shown that dogs that are chained are more likely to bite than <br />unchained dogs. The second is the humane issue. Prolonged chaining is harmful to dogs and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.