Browse
Search
ORD-2008-069 - Proposed Animal Ordinance Amendment on the Tethering of Dogs
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2008
>
ORD-2008-069 - Proposed Animal Ordinance Amendment on the Tethering of Dogs
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 11:17:17 AM
Creation date
3/11/2010 3:20:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/20/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-20-2008-5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 05-20-2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Carey said that the Board may ask staff to bring back further information <br />and it may want to refer this back to the Tethering Committee or ASAB for consideration, if <br />need be. <br />Commissioner Foushee said that there are questions that the Board of County <br />Commissioners needs an opportunity to raise, but she does not want to bring this up until the <br />public has had their say. She has questions about enforcement. <br />Chair Jacobs made a few suggestions. He said that it is not a competition to see who <br />gets the most speakers or who has the loudest applause. He said that he sees a number of <br />people signed up to speak who spoke last time, and he asked that they not speak again, in <br />courtesy to others who have not spoken yet. He said that the Board does listen, and the same <br />things do not need to be said again. There was a citizen in opposition to what Chair Jacobs <br />said. <br />Chair Jacobs also asked that anyone that comes to speak please remove their hats. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT: <br />Dennis Carden is from Caldwell in Orange County and is a charter member of the Quail <br />Farm Beagle Club. This club has 50 kennels built to USDA standards, and they oppose this <br />tethering ordinance and the pen laws that are included in it. He said that he is an AKC <br />licensed judge and he travels all over judging beagles. He feels that this ordinance invades <br />their rights as hunters and dog owners. He said that these dog owners have had a lifetime <br />commitment and he feels like they are not even being considered. He thinks that it is all about <br />what the Tethering Committee thinks. He said that USDA already has a standard size pen. <br />He asked what is big enough. He said that he takes very good care of his dogs and keeps his <br />pens and feeding bowls clean. He said that he was proud to be an Orange County citizen until <br />recently. <br />Charles Best is a lifetime resident of Orange County. He owns 300 acres of land and <br />said that he works hard to keep it. His father taught him how to hunt as a child, to respect a <br />gun, and how to treat a dog. He said that in the 30's, it was good to have rabbit or squirrel on <br />the table. He said that he feels like he was losing his right to teach his children about having <br />dogs. He has small dogs now. He does not see how smaller dogs need the same size pen as <br />larger dogs. He does not think that more laws are needed, because there are laws now for <br />people that mistreat dogs. He challenged the Board to come out to NC 54 and the Quail Farm <br />Beagle Club. He said that revenues come in to the County through the field trials that the <br />beagle club coordinates. He said that he has had dogs all of his life and he loves his dogs. <br />He thinks that he is being penalized. <br />David Aman said that he is speaking in favor of the tethering ordinance amendment. <br />He said that passage of this amendment would give the Animal Protection officials an <br />additional tool with which to come to the aid of a distressed and neglected dog that has been <br />chained for an inordinately long period of time. He said that this ordinance amendment is <br />based on a genuine expressed interest driven by citizens who live within the boundaries of this <br />County. To his knowledge, there is no ordinance amendment supporter who receives money <br />from anyone within or outside of the County to professionally organize or lobby for the <br />passage of this type of local issue. He said that this process has been going on for one year, <br />and this is the fourth public hearing. <br />Robin Harrison said that she has been a resident for 20 years. She said that her dog is <br />tethered now, and she would be breaking this ordinance by just attending this meeting. She <br />said that if she left her dogs loose, they would dig under, climb over, or high jump her fence. <br />She said that this amendment does not make sense and she is opposed to it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.