Browse
Search
ORD-2008-069 - Proposed Animal Ordinance Amendment on the Tethering of Dogs
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2008
>
ORD-2008-069 - Proposed Animal Ordinance Amendment on the Tethering of Dogs
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 11:17:17 AM
Creation date
3/11/2010 3:20:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/20/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-20-2008-5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 05-20-2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Aj0 <br />presentation tonight. She said that there should be a date certain that things should stop <br />changing, because the Planning Board still has some critical questions. <br />Michelle Kempinski, Planning Board member, asked if the Board of County <br />Commissioners received the two copies of the Holshouser report. She said that there are <br />differences in the two analyses. The second version contains an extra page, which is the <br />methodology section. <br />Laura Blackmon said that the first copy was a draft that was given to the Planning <br />Board, and the Planning Board asked for additional information. <br />Chair Jacobs suggested moving forward and having the Planning Board take its <br />economic development recommendations to the EDC and having the Planning Board work on <br />Planning items — traffic analysis, issues about water and sewer, conditions, etc. The Economic <br />Development Commission meets this month and in July, and there can be a recommendation <br />back to the Board of County Commissioners from the EDC also. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Nelson to <br />accept the Planning Board's recommendation and schedule the Planning Board to come back <br />with a report on September 2 "d <br />Commissioner Nelson thanked the members of the Planning Board for their candor. He <br />said that this economic analysis was not a good product. <br />Chair Jacobs asked what to communicate to the consultant and Commissioner Nelson <br />said that he does not want the consultant to do another report. <br />Geof Gledhill clarified that the motion was to condense the Administration <br />recommendation to direct the Planning Board to complete its work and provide its <br />recommendation by the last meeting before September, which is August 6'n. The County <br />Commissioners would have to adjourn the public hearing to September 2nd at a specified time <br />and place. The Board does not have to receive into evidence information or the <br />recommendations of the Planning Board at this time. The recommendations could be folded <br />into one recommendation for the next time this is considered. He suggested that the Planning <br />Board recommendation be brought back to the Board of County Commissioners no later than <br />September 2 "d and that the public hearing be adjourned until September 2 "d <br />Chair Jacobs asked Geof Gledhill to clarify what he is suggesting. <br />Geof Gledhill said that if the Planning Board does not complete its work by August 6'n <br />then that means that, in order for it to provide a recommendation back to the Board before <br />September 2 "d, it has to have a special meeting. He suggested that the recommendation be <br />brought back to the Board of County Commissioners no later than September 2nd and that the <br />public hearing be adjourned to September 2 "d <br />Commissioner Gordon agreed to amend her motion to reflect Geof Gledhill's comments <br />above, to adjourn the public hearing until September 2nd and have the recommendations come <br />back from the Planning Board at this time. Commissioner Nelson accepted this. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />6. Reaular Agenda <br />a. Proposed Animal Ordinance Amendment on the Tethering of Dogs <br />The Board considered adopting a proposed ordinance amendment to the Orange <br />County Animal Ordinance restricting the tethering of dogs. <br />Animal Services Director Bob Marotto introduced Chair of the Animal Services Advisory <br />Board, Dr. Ross Oglesby. He said that the proposal before the Board is the result of a <br />tremendous amount of work by the Tethering Committee and the ASAB over a very long <br />period of time. The committee and the ASAB had discussions with experts from other <br />jurisdictions in North Carolina. Public input sessions also played a role in the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.