Browse
Search
ORD-2010-025 Upper Eno Watershed Critical Area-Zoning Ordinance
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2010-2019
>
2010
>
ORD-2010-025 Upper Eno Watershed Critical Area-Zoning Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2019 3:04:34 PM
Creation date
3/5/2010 12:50:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/22/2010
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-22-2010
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
Minutes 02-22-2010
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 2/3/10 <br />Attachment 6 <br />43 <br />1 SURfiMARY NOTES <br />2 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br />3 JANUARY 6, 2010 <br />q' ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE <br />5 <br />6 NOTE: A quorum is not required for Ordinance Review Committee meetings. <br />7 <br />8 MEMBERS PRESENT: Brian Crawford, Eno Township At-Large (Chair); Judith Wegner, Bingham Township Representative (Vice- <br />9 Chair); Mary Bobbitt-Cooke, Cheeks Township Representative; Jeff Schmitt, Cedar Grove Township Representative; Earl McKee, <br />10 Little River Representative; Peter Hallenbeck, Cheeks Township At-Large; Larry Wright, Cedar Grove Township At-Large; <br />11 <br />12 STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning & Inspections Director, Tom Altieri, Comprehensive Planning Supervisor, Michael Harvey, <br />13 Zoning Enforcement Officer; Perdita Holiz, Planning Systems Coordinator; Tina Love, Administrative Assistant II <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 AGENDA ITEM 2 WATER SUPPLY WATERSHED CRRICAL AREA REVISIONS <br />20 To receive and comment upon the proposed Land Use Element (text and map) and Zoning Ordinance (text <br />21 and map) Amendments regarding °critical areas° designations. <br />22 <br />23 Presenter: Craig Benedict, Planning & Inspections Director <br />24 <br />25 Craig Benedict presented a PowerPoint presentation on the water supply watersheds. He gave the Board a history of how the lines <br />26 got put on the map and the 1987 study for potential reservoirs done by Hazen& Sawyer. <br />27 <br />28 Jeff Schmitt gave the Board information on the Board of Adjustment's rulings regarding the lines and the subsequent appeal the <br />29 Superior Court. <br />30 <br />31 Craig Benedict stated staff is planning to have the amendments on the February Quarterly Public Hearing. <br />32 <br />33 The Planning Board discussed the growth of Orange County and Craig Benedict advised that the 84% of the entire County is rural <br />34 and only 16% is planned to have an urban style growth. He advised it is the growth pattern that will be held for the foreseeable <br />35 future; the undeveloped areas within the future growth area can accommodate the population growth anticipated for Orange County <br />36 in the next twenty years. <br />37 <br />38 Judith Wegner noted the problems with Jordan Lake and water quality and also advised that with the growth of Wake County there <br />39 may be a chance that Orange County will have a better locale for a reservoir and sell water to other counties to supplement their <br />40 water supplies and it would supplement Orange County's income. She asked how the County can look at the broader picture and <br />41 how to know the water quality if there is tightening provisions at the federal level. <br />42 <br />43 Craig Benedict advised the Board that staff could write up thoughts to cover the points suggested by the Board. Craig continued with <br />44 pointing out several areas on the map regarding watersheds and the possible future reservoirs. <br />45 <br />46 Judith Wegner noted that if there is a water supply and you design a reservoir, even if it takes time to fill, it is still a holding site. If <br />47 you build a holding capacity and it fills up whatever isn't lost to evaporation, still has an economic value. <br />48 <br />49 Craig Benedict advised that some of the reservoirs are 'shallow water' reservoirs and the impoundments are maybe 40 feet deep and <br />50 therefore the water capacity is light. He noted that the recommendation reflects that it will roughly be the preservation of land for <br />51 future water supply the same areas as current minus the small area in Efland north of 85. Craig advised that staff will check with <br />52 Durham for any potential reservoir sites in the Little River or Lower Eno where there is a potential intake. He noted Little River has <br />53 lower density. <br />54 <br />55 Michael Harvey reminded the Board there is a quarry site on Highway 57 which is on the boarder of Durham County is a future site of <br />56 a reservoir. <br />57 <br />58 Craig Benedict advised that staff can pull together anything dealing with Orange County's potential or future reservoir sties and also <br />59 make sure there is some level of protection for the future. He. noted the recommendation reflects that even though staff recommends <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.