Browse
Search
Minutes 02-02-2010
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Minutes 02-02-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2016 1:03:39 PM
Creation date
3/4/2010 1:26:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/2/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 3a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 3b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 3c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4h
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4i
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4j
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4k
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4l
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4m
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4n
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4o
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4p
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 4q
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 5a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 6a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 6b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 6c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 6d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 6e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 7b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Information Item
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
ORD-2010-012 EMS Second Reading: Amendments to the EMS Franchise Agreement
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2010
ORD-2010-013 Partnership Academy (Alternative School) Orange County Schools Capital Project Ordinance
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2010
ORD-2010-014 Fire/Safety Upgrades Orange County Schools Capital Project Ordinance
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2010
ORD-2010-015 Bathroom Renovations Orange County Schools Capital Project Ordinance
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2010
Proclamation proclaiming February 2010 as Human Relations Month
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Proclamations\2010-2019\2010
RES-2010-002 Resolution approving Property Tax Release/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
RES-2010-003 Resolution approving Property Tax Releases
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
RES-2010-004 Resolution approving Property Value Changes
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
RES-2010-005 Resolution approving Applications for Property Tax Exemption/Exclusion
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
RES-2010-006 Resolution Providing for the Appointment of a Special Board of Equalization and Review with Compromise Authority
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
RES-2010-007 Resolution Regarding Publication of Bond Order
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
RES-2010-008 Amendment to Bond Resolution adopted on 12-15-2009 approving Issuance General Obligation Bonds Refinance County Bonds Issued 2001 & 2003
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
RES-2010-009 Resolution Exercising Orange County's Statutory Right of First Refusal and Declining the Purchase of Board of Education Property
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
RES-2010-010 Resolution approving the No Fault Privately Owned Well Repair Concept, authorizing the development and implementing the policy for properties near landfill
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
with the Comprehensive Transportation Plan, which is why it is coming forward now. She said <br /> that the strategic highway corridors is where NCDOT will be spending most of its funds. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz asked for some information about what NCDOT was thinking <br /> when it designated NC 86 as a strategic corridor. Karen Lincoln said that NCDOT was looking <br /> at regional connections (Danville to this area). Commissioner Yuhasz said that it would be <br /> helpful to know if NCDOT considered NC 49 or NC 119. He said that this vision plan is not <br /> going to be just locally determined because it is a statewide plan. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz said that it sounds like, with Option 3 ( from the Manager's <br /> recommendation), that DOT will continue to work with Orange County on a local transportation <br /> plan and giving Orange County the opportunity to continue to question whether or not NC 86 <br /> needs to be built this way. He said that it is better to be engaged then disengaged. <br /> Chair Foushee asked, if the County Commissioners were to endorse Option 3 ( from <br /> the Manager's recommendation), if it would preclude the Board from doing the things that are <br /> suggested. <br /> Karen Lincoln said that there is no guarantee that NC 86 would be removed from the <br /> state plan. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that she does not believe it would take that much time for <br /> the Board to review the requested information. She said that the Board did not have the pros <br /> and cons, background information, sufficient maps, and the regional plan. She does not think <br /> it would take too much time to get this. <br /> Craig Benedict said that staff could produce a regional map to provide better context. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that he would like to know if the designation also assumed <br /> that the Elizabeth Road Bypass was going to be in place around Hillsborough. He suggested <br /> a compromise resolution. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Hemminger <br /> to endorse Option 3 (listed below from the Manager's recommendation) to continue <br /> development of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan with a phased plan for improvements <br /> to NC 86 with no explicit endorsement by the Board of Commissioners, and request specific <br /> information regarding: <br /> • Process for approval <br /> • Regional options <br /> • Assumptions underlying designation of NC 86 as a strategic highway corridor <br /> • Relationship of Comprehensive Transportation Plan to the Orange County Land Use <br /> Plan <br /> • What is being contemplated to include public comment before the approval of the <br /> Comprehensive Transportation Plan <br /> Option 3 — Show NC 86 as a future expressway with a phased improvement plan in the <br /> technical report. Work on Orange County's Comprehensive Transportation Plan would <br /> continue as planned. <br /> Survey question twelve offered seven options for designating a north-south corridor from <br /> Caswell County to US 70 Bypass as a four-lane divided expressway. Respondents could <br /> select more than one option. Of the 387 survey responses, approximately 63% chose to use <br /> the existing NC 86 corridor (with a narrow margin preferring a new western bypass of <br /> Hillsborough). Over twenty-one percent (21.4%) chose "Do not improve NC 86 to an <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.