Minutes 02-02-2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

plan on behalf of all three municipalities (excluding Mebane at this time) and the County due to the County's role owning the landfill and managing the recycling and waste reduction programs, and the Make Reports section of the Interlocal Agreement. The last plan submittal, for 2006, was essentially a descriptive placeholder type document, with solid waste planning activity continuing until the present through the efforts of the Solid Waste Plan Work Group. The Solid Waste Plan Work Group is made up of elected officials, staff and citizen members of the Solid Waste Advisory Board (SWAB) from all jurisdictions, and was instituted in 2005 to create a more cohesive planning process whose intention is to bring to the governing boards concepts and recommendations on a range of county-wide waste management issues. Gayle Wilson said that staff believes that the time has come to proceed toward completion of the latest version of the 3-year update of the 10-year plan by the Work Group, not only to meet the state's three year plan update objective, but also to provide guidance to County citizens and governments with regard to future direction of recycling and waste management in Orange County. While the planning is not yet complete, at some point a document must be completed and submitted, even if all issues are not fully developed. Additionally, he said the Board of Commissioners are looking for guidance with regard to current rural waste and recycling services, specifically the future role of solid waste convenience centers and a more sustainable funding source for the rural services provided through the convenience centers, which has been the subject of most recent Work Group deliberations. He said that staff is concerned with the ongoing and continuing nature of the Solid Waste planning efforts and the resulting delay and seeks to develop a 3-Year Plan Update and submit to the State at the earliest opportunity, addressing the remaining unresolved issues in the next 3-Year Update due in June 2012. It has been suggested to give all jurisdictions an update at the March Assembly of Governments Meeting. He said that the work group has supported strongly the 61% waste reduction goal, and they have recently been informed that the County's FY 2008-09 waste reduction is 54%. He said that the Work Group adopted some goals — page 6 — Solid Waste Planning Goals for Evaluation of Rural Waste Management Issues: The prioritization of goals to guide decision making with regard to unincorporated area waste issues was completed by the Work Group. The ranking has meeting the 61% diversion goal as receiving the strongest support resulting in a weighting of 28.9%. Safety is second at 18.7%; cost-effective operations third at 18.6%; sustainable funding system fourth at 15.2%; reduced environmental impact fifth at 12.6%; and cost equity last at 5.9%. Based on those priorities, an overarching principle for design and operation of the centers needs to support recycling and waste reduction while enabling users to minimize what is actually discarded. Neighborhood/District Network Option Solid Waste Convenience Centers (SWCC) He said that the Solid Waste Planning Work Group (Work Group) had been discussing Solid Waste Convenience Centers (SWCC) and other rural waste management issues due in part to the recent public interest in budget related service reduction recommendations. He said this update does not attempt to comprehensively describe the various alternatives and issues considered or discussed as this is a work in progress for the Work Group but only highlight a small portion of the Work Group's effort on the subject. This update will focus on summarizing the center upgrade options considered and the SWCC service scenario that scored/ranked highest on the Work Group's adopted program goals and weighting factors - the Neighborhood/District option for the future of SWCCs in Orange County. This was first introduced by Commissioner Jacobs and was one of five SWCC development scenarios