Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-02-2010 - 4l
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 03-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-02-2010 - 4l
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2010 9:23:42 AM
Creation date
2/26/2010 9:18:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/2/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4L
Document Relationships
2010-032 Planning - Professional Services Related to the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2010
2010-032b Planning - Contract Professional Services Related to Orange County Unified Development Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2010
Minutes 03-02-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
112 <br />Annotated Outline <br />development standards creates undue hardship. The general intent of the existing variance provisions is that the hardship standard <br />required to be demonstrated for approval of a variance be stringent <br />(e gadadministrative adjustmen)Ibeforeebe n'g eligiblerto apply for a vartance.t The text will alsoadarlfy (based on relcently-amended <br />state legislation} that a variance may not be used to allow a change in the uses permitted within a particular zoning district The section <br />will also require documents memorializing an approved variance be recorded at the Register of Deeds. <br />Administrative Adjustment <br />adjustdany numer catsUndard in the d nonce by up t 10 percent ba ed onDaOvery specific e tof criteriaD.1rThe procedur~is designed <br />scenarios on exceptionally d'iffi ulrto develop site a1Hs intended forsdevelopment th t ponesadvance~the goalsdandupuaposes of the <br />general zoning district in which it is located; two, is more or equally effective In achieving the relevant standards from which the <br />modification is granted; or three, relieves practical difficulties of developing a site. In addition, we recommend a second tier <br />251 pe cent poutsdeathe hardshiperequfrements tofethe vananBeard h'sconsuggesteduas away to acocommodate (redevelopment and <br />development on less desirable inffll sites. <br />therpurpose of establ~hingfdeveopment thatd'rsusupenorrthannlwouldootherwiseorresult from ca strict appliwtionrofathe typical <br />development standards. The procedure will also include detailed timing provisions as well as limits on multiple use of the procedure to <br />substantially deviate from the UDO standards. See Page 2-15 in the diagnosis for more details on the administrative adjustment <br />proposal. <br />Interpretation <br />Numerous stakeholders expressed concerns regarding the interpretation of current zoning provisions, and the lack of a clear proce ure <br />authorizes the Planning Directorpto make an off caalrinterlpretation of the o divan e with assistance f oamrtherTown Atto ey only after <br />an application for an interpretation has been submitted. Elected and appointed bodies may request interpretations without need of a <br />formal application. The new procedure will include language indicating that any interpretation made outride of this process shall not <br />be binding. <br />otebook foreseveral reasonsanFirstg, tDhey coon be ~ ferced to when mak ng future nterpretatfons to ensure cons~t nrcy n therapplicat can <br />of the code; and second, they can be used as a road map in identifying provisions that might need future amendments. See page 2-6 <br />of the diagnosis for more details on this procedure. <br />Appeal <br />decisionsmaking blod es thatt arerdCOnsidered by the Board of Adjustme t (BOA}alsThis section will clarfysthesdght of appeal by persons <br />appeals fomedec'osionsf by reviewr bod err, anddthe assocliated tim framescandrlimitations specifed byOthe Genleral Statutes assoc ated <br />with appeals to the Superior Court of Orange County. <br />Vested Rights Determination <br />This section will include provisions as specified under the North Carolina Ceneral Statutes. The seNon will clarify thaT the Town Board <br />and recommendation by the Planning Board.y The sedbon willrset out the requGements for vesUng,gthe effect of a vested site spec fic <br />development plan or preliminary plat, and procedures addressing the revocation or expiration of a vested right <br />Beneficial Use Determination <br />Over the last decade a growing number of local governments have included a procedure in their land use regulations that allows any <br />local elected body.llThis procedure is called a beneficiarl userdetersm nationkin~ of their properly to seek administrative relief from the <br />Hillsborough, North Carolina <br />Unified Development Ordinance I Draft November0, 2009 <br />Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.