Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-22-2010 - Agenda
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 02-22-2010 - Joint Mtg. Hills. BOC
>
Agenda - 02-22-2010 - Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2012 4:24:08 PM
Creation date
2/18/2010 4:24:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/22/2010
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-22-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />higher priority items to accomplish further implementation of the Efland- Mebane Small Area <br />Plan which calls for a re- evaluation of the Critical Area boundary for Seven Mile Creek. <br />The current Critical Area boundary is based upon a potential reservoir (1987 Study) being <br />created on Seven Mile Creek and the full pool elevation of the reservoir was used as the <br />calculation point for the'/ -mile Critical Area boundary in 1994. Staff gave a presentation on this <br />topic at the October 13, 2009 BOCC work session and the BOCC directed staff to proceed with <br />the proposed amendments. <br />At the time the initial Critical Area boundary was adopted (1994), the Town of Hillsborough was <br />going through the process of deciding which potential reservoir site on the Upper Eno River <br />should be chosen for its needed reservoir. The County adopted a Critical Area boundary that <br />protected three identified potential reservoir sites (see Map 3.4 in Attachment 3): <br />• West Fork on the Eno <br />• Eno River above McGowan Creek <br />• Seven Mile Creek <br />Ultimately, the Town chose to build its reservoir on the West Fork on the Eno site, which was <br />constructed to allow for a future Phase II expansion. The Town has no plans to construct an <br />additional reservoir. For this reason, County staff is suggesting that references to potential <br />reservoir sites be removed from the Zoning Ordinance text and that the Critical Area boundary <br />be amended accordingly. . <br />State and County Critical Areas <br />When the Critical Area text and map boundary was adopted by the BOCC in 1994 in response <br />to State mandates to protect Class I Water Supply Reservoirs, Orange County opted to adopt <br />protection measures beyond the State - required minimum. A local government is permitted to do <br />so under the State Rules. Staff is suggesting that the County regulations more clearly indicate <br />that a portion of the Critical Area is State - required while other portions are County- designated. <br />It should be noted that both State - required and County- designated Critical Areas are proposed <br />to be subject to the same regulations. Map 3.3 in Attachment 3 depicts the State - required and <br />County- designated Critical Areas. <br />New Definitions <br />Staff is suggesting the Zoning Ordinance text be amended to reflect new technically descriptive <br />criteria for the County- designated Critical Areas. Specifically, staff is suggesting that Class II <br />reservoirs (West Fork on the Eno and Lake Orange) receive the same protection as Class I <br />reservoirs (Corporation Lake and Lake Ben Johnson). The amendments to Article 22 <br />(Definitions) of the Zoning Ordinance (see Attachment 1) includes the technical definitions of <br />Class I and Class II reservoirs. In layman's terms, the difference between the two types of <br />reservoirs is that the intake pipe for a water treatment plant is located in the Class I reservoir. A <br />Class 11 reservoir does not contain the intake pipe. Staff is also suggesting that certain <br />important streams receive County- designated Critical Area protection. Staff is proposing this be <br />accomplished by protecting streams of a certain hierarchy (stream order). Attachment 4 is a <br />staff "white paper" that further explains why this is important. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.