Orange County NC Website
i1 <br />Surrounding Land Uses: <br />•NORTH: <br />Across Old NC 10 there are several properties zoned R-1 with one (1) parcel zoned EC-5. <br />•SOUTH/EAST/WEST: <br />Properties are zoned <br />R-1. There are several single-family residences surrounding the property. <br />Request: <br />•Rezone property from EC-5 to R-1, <br />•The property owner has indicated that they are unsure why the property was zoned EC-5, <br />•They are currently utilizing the property for residential purposes, <br />•They have no interest in maintaining the commercial zoning designation on the property <br />Zoning Officer Analysis: <br />•The application is deemed to be complete in accordance with the provisions of Article Twenty <br />(20) of the Zoning Ordinance, specifically Section 20.3.2, <br />•The applicants have no interest, or intent, in developing/operating acommercial land use from <br />the property. This represents a changing condition that makes the rezoning request reasonable <br />as required under Section 20.3.2 (d) of the Ordinance, <br />•The Zoning Officer has concluded that the request is reasonable and consistent with the goals <br />of the Comprehensive Plan, which has the area designated as Rurat Residential, as required <br />under Section 20.3.2 (e) of the Ordinance. <br />Staff Recommendations: <br />•Receive the rezoning petition, <br />•Conduct the public hearing to hear and consider public comment, <br />•Refer the matter to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the County <br />Board of Commissioners no later than January 8, 2009, and <br />•Adjoum the public hearing until February 3, 2009 in order to receive and accept the Planning <br />Board's recommendation <br />Commissioner Gordon said that the Statement of Consistency should be Statement of <br />Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Chair Jacobs said that, as part of the Land Use Plan Update/Implementation, there <br />should be a systemic review and approach to everyone with an EC designation to see if they <br />are still~valid. Staff answered that this is currently ongoing. There are 20 properties now under <br />study. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT: <br />Dennis Jones said that he had no idea when he bought the property that it had an EC-5 <br />zoning. He wants it to go back to residential zoning. <br />Jeffrey Schmitt asked if there was any way that these 20 some properties could be <br />wrapped together and Michael Harvey said that they would each need their own rezoning <br />petition. <br />