Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 02-02-2010 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 4:42:34 PM
Creation date
1/29/2010 4:42:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/2/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-02-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
ORD-2010-012 EMS Second Reading: Amendments to the EMS Franchise Agreement
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. North Carolina Administrative Code, 10A NCAC 13P .0101 et seq. <br />2 <br />The Board at its meeting on January 21, 2010 voted 6-1 to approve the amendments to the <br />EMS Franchise Ordinance. North Carolina General Statute §153A-45 provides that in order for <br />an ordinance to be adopted on its first reading it "must receive the approval of all the members <br />of the board of commissioners. If the ordinance is approved by a majority of those voting but <br />not by all the members of the board... it shall be considered at the next regular meeting of the <br />board." <br />The history of Board actions on these amendments to this Ordinance is as follows: <br />• This matter first came before the Board on December 7, 2009, the Board voted to delay <br />the item. Prior to the meeting, both the Orange County Rescue Squad ("OCRs") and <br />South Orange Rescue Squad's ("SORB") attorneys were given a copy of the <br />amendments to the EMS Franchise Ordinance. OCRs came before the Board at the <br />December 7, 2009 meeting and presented a letter in opposition to the amendments. <br />Specifically, OCRs was opposed to the composition of the EMS Advisory Committee and <br />the due process provided in the Ordinance. The attorney for SORB had no concerns <br />about either the EMS Advisory Committee or the due process requirements. The Board <br />asked the County Attorney to review the letter presented by OCRs prior to acting on the <br />Ordinance. <br />Response: The County Attorney's Office reviewed the letter and found that both the <br />EMS Advisory Committee and the due process provisions provided by the Ordinance <br />comported to the requirements of due process under both the federal and state <br />constitutions. <br />On January 21, 2010, these amendments were brought before the Board, the Board <br />voted 6-1 to approve the amendments to the Ordinance. Fire Chiefs from several <br />volunteer fire departments raised concerns about not having input into the changes to <br />the Ordinance and questioned how the amendments to the Ordinance would affect them. <br />OCRs again indicated it opposed the amendments to the Ordinance for the same <br />reasons they indicated on December 7, 2009 and SORB spoke in favor of the proposed <br />amendments to the Ordinance. The Board expressed concerns about the fire <br />departments' position and the composition of the Emergency Medical Service Advisory <br />Committee and EMS Peer Review Committee. <br />Response: At the Board's December 7th meeting staff from the County Attorney`s office <br />indicated the amendments to the EMS Franchise Ordinance did not require volunteer fire <br />departments to be permitted a franchise to provide services that are considered fire <br />fighting services. The volunteer fire departments are not in the business of providing the <br />services governed by the Ordinance. There was no change recommended to require fire <br />departments to have a franchise. The volunteer fire departments contract with the <br />County to provide fire fighting and fire prevention service in the County. Fire fighting <br />services necessarily include both first/medical responder and extrication services, which <br />are incidental to their obligations and specifically referenced in their existing contracts. <br />However, the North Carolina Administrative Code provides that County governments <br />shall establish an EMS System that has among other things: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.