Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-21-2010 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 01-21-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 01-21-2010 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2010 2:46:16 PM
Creation date
1/15/2010 2:46:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/21/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 01-21-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Services) for hunters whose dogs are caught or left behind on private property -are not <br />deemed to provide the "blanket" protection some seek. (Note: Anson, Gate and Moore <br />counties have obtained State approval to compel additional requirements/restrictions <br />about hunting deer with dogs; i.e., requiring the dog to wear a collar identifying the name <br />and address of the owner.) <br />^ NC Wildlife Resources officials are short staffed and hard pressed to respond sufficiently <br />to counter or apprehend perceived or actual trespassers. <br />^ Law enforcement has found it difficult to precisely quantify the extent of the problem out <br />in the field since situations may arise and dissipate before they arrive on the scene, <br />incidents may simply go unreported, and individuals may be fearful of calling attention to <br />complaints or having to testify in court. <br />^ Criticism and objections were directed towards using dogs to hunt deer, not towards <br />using dogs to hunt other wildlife such as rabbits or game birds. <br />^ The central deer season with gun hunting allowed in Orange County for 2009 was <br />November 15, 2009 -January 1, 2010. Any regulatory action authorized by the General <br />Assembly for Orange County in 2010 could be implemented and effective no sooner than <br />for the 2010 deer season. <br />Additionally, County staff has learned of a "Survey of Landowners Who Own Large Tracts of <br />Land Concerning Deer Management and Hunting", conducted by Responsive Management <br />in December 2008 for the NC Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) and published in <br />2009. The study entailed a telephone survey of owners of tracts of land of at least 5 acres in <br />the state. The majority of landowners responding used the land as a residence for their own <br />use or that of another person and identified locations as being rural, whether a farm or not. The <br />mean age of respondents was 60 and the mean amount of time in the community was 34 years. <br />The total number of survey respondents was 1619 with Orange County respondents <br />representing 3.6 percent (n=59). The top counties in which the tracts of land are located among <br />landowners in the sample were Union, Randolph, Chatham, Orange, Wilkes, and Rockingham. <br />(Only those with 5 acres or more were kept in the survey.) (Note: The complete Survey is <br />included with this agenda item on the County website - www.co.orange.nc.us -under "Meeting <br />Agendas" -January 21, 2010 -Item 6-a.) <br />The NCWRC survey queried landowners on their opinions of deer and the deer <br />population, problems with deer, hunting of deer on land, management of deer on land, <br />other opinions on deer hunting regulations, and overall participation in outdoor <br />activities. Survey results most applicable to the dogging deer issue before the BOCC are <br />detailed below: <br />• Ninety-three percent approved of legal, regulated hunting. <br />• Ninety-two percent agreed that written permission from the landowner should be required <br />to hunt on private land. <br />• Top four reasons cited for not allowing others beyond the landowner or immediate <br />household to hunt on the land were -concern about a hunter injuring another person on <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.