|
<br />`.1'iJ~1Q;~ ~`a Qr ~ Si.i:°! S~~t7 K~uK~ del i~ 'r2 i~'G~'.~E'~5i >~~f?~'i '~+ ur;~/~r I~E`c~2,'~'Q r C~-~1 ~~GA u",~i
<br />~ ~ ~fC M f' t ! tr` h f f'C ~ t (-r r rn r>< f j fi ~ ~ F fi Y a '~ ~ i Zi to e! R ~ f
<br />t!!5u f.f..~!(~: ~U~I ~i r~r t'.J J~~ ~?#, .G i,,i.l., ,~=rC. 5~~.~ L~ U~i~l ~'.SF ~I~,;r.. .u L:1 ..C.f S.~~P,
<br />F ft
<br />fhqQ ~'~;~fh nffrr (/+:~ryrrp( [~j ~itf/{r ( /~It ~r.r..f }~ '.1 *;!1 f''t//~~ i}~!'t~ ~~~r `` ~r4 T'n" ~/~ 7 t /^~ ' /~•• tp^f'
<br />t L , v. 1 IIt3. Lrf .lt. {~i I.li.t I~l..t~~~ f.l r:t~.t ..,s~.i LtN U .e 1iJ..t. !wf .s/>~LM I~i..it JI w,~V 1~ U~ 1tL71y .i1.I1F~
<br />J
<br />}.~?~~ ~iG'~`~; ur rho n~`.~C~ t~yS'-~~-war Of r~'rG~~S ~v,, vG`I'"~~G i~ fhb svr•i~{ tiri rho r,~r~-,;`-'~
<br />~` f~. j to t7'A /A. ~f1 tnr ~rT + , @ }! t ~ rr7 ~~ ^ ~.: '~~ J r.!i 1',U s_,r~ ~ ~tt+
<br />a~J~r v!U~?~~ r~(ST ~3.~1 _~ ~ ~„',1:, ~~~,~ir ,~J;t,? ~J>f~i„~ l~vSt i~2.~~ ~,~,'!s~ (f Y „~I~.Gf ;~, r,+„~vS
<br />~! i , 'Y t ,'iry ~ AArrr~~tl~. t""'~ 11}~^ r ^ ~~e 1~ t . IfP ''f In ~_rif_ s~ nF "~ nir.¢- .~ ~ry R
<br />lt~, ~~ ~ G~if .I, .rYl~v "1~V: l f tit~v~ I~t ~ti~~ /~. ~+v ~~ t~iG ~.V l t~l~ ~ ~f•!; >f ~`J~ vi ~'.c-_4J ~J. tV +i
<br />i i t'. ff/~ h nr~~121^ '" Ern i } ~, ~ I+i k Pr 4' ~ '1' .1 ^ 1 } i i
<br />S.s7+t~ :~w?'C~ ~iti'~~1 ;ti; t !L'St f~~.~~ .C y ~:(t i,~~:l~~ +yir-.~ 4f~~~~3 !~~' ~~~.~~ ~0 ~ S,Uk~
<br />~r! ~ ; ~ +a ~!~t" CS C~ r C+ !~ ~' S 3r'd y ~ , r ~° '~ " r
<br />ui~ S,C~° ~.~~n ti ~ e t ~~ AI~ t,v f u( /~~~t~ ~+~. ~~J,Cr tt;h,~~y1~~ ft21~~y{~,~ iri~?6~1 L~Si
<br />Tp~ n -l~.ir~} ,}, r, ~n9 1 `1 a•GT ry r @~ ~!:.~d t~ ii~r ~r'i~E ~~IJ Y4V~v V` t1-Yry~ I~~il~+I`
<br />1~~. ~4t .SF ti f', r! ., 4.IQ IvG 1~~1. ~U JV'~~ L~.lk s ~ C ~ r ' G t), } ~, i~7.
<br />In accordance with the Ordinance, the Board hereby makes the fo_Ilowing findings as to
<br />the appropriateness of the Application:
<br />1. That the Application is complete in accordance with the submittal requirements
<br />detailed within Article Twenty {20) of the Ordinance; specifically Section 20:3.2;
<br />2. That per Section 20.3.2 (c) of the Zoning Ordinance, staff and the property owner
<br />allege a mapping error making the Zoning Atlas Petition reasonable necessary in
<br />promoting the public health,. safety, and general welfare.
<br />Specifically, the existing. non-residential zoning designation is not located in
<br />accordance with the existing nan-residential operation that was in existence in
<br />1994. The approval of the petition will correct for this error and properly reflect
<br />the exact location of the non-residential zoning designation on the property.
<br />3. That per Section 20.3,2 (e) of the Zoning Ordinance, the approval of the Zoning
<br />Atlas Petition would carry out the intent of the Orange County Comprehensive
<br />Plan.
<br />Specifically, the approval of the petition would property designate an EC-5 zoning
<br />designation on a parcel of property where there is an existing non-residential
<br />land use in operation.
<br />This Ordinance shall become effective upon approval.
<br />Adopted by the Orange County Baard. of Commissioners this day of
<br />2009.
<br />Ayes:
<br />
|