Orange County NC Website
composting, new collection and financing strategies, and public education programs to encourage <br />involvement in all aspects of waste management from generation through disposal. The County is <br />implementing an integrated solid waste management strategy to achieve a 61 percent waste <br />reduction goal. <br />2.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS <br />Orange County has undertaken a thorough review of its MSW management program over the past <br />several years and has considered and evaluated numerous alternatives during the process. The <br />concept of the transfer station itself is a product of this process, being an alternative to the <br />construction of a new landfill. The Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) initiated a <br />comprehensive site selection process to locate the proposed solid waste transfer station. The <br />County has also investigated various alternatives to construction of a transfer station. These <br />analyses have progressed along two tracks. The Alternative Methodology Track has been to <br />further investigate whether there are viable alternatives to the construction of a County -owned <br />transfer station. This analysis has shown the construction of a County -owned transfer station to be <br />a necessity and the best methodology for management of Orange County's MSW for the <br />foreseeable future. The Site Selection Track has been used to develop and implement a set of <br />criteria for identifying and ranking candidate sites and to select a suitable site for the transfer <br />station within the County. <br />2.1 Alternative Methodolociv Track <br />As mentioned previously, GBB conducted the Alternative Waste Processing Assessment] to <br />explore reasonable alternatives to landfill disposal of MSW by Orange County. The study <br />concluded that at Orange County's current level of solid wastes generation (less than 250 tons per <br />day), the cost of financing, building, owning, and operating a waste -to- energy plant would be in <br />the range of $100 per ton of refuse processed after sale of electricity generated from the heat <br />recovered from incineration and sale of scrap metal recovered from the residual ash. Based upon <br />the estimated costs of constructing and operating the transfer station, transport, and landfilling at a <br />regional private- sector disposal site, GBB concluded that it was not economical in the short term to <br />consider a stand -alone waste combustion facility to handle waste from only Orange County. It was <br />also concluded that the other emerging technologies investigated in the study are at present not <br />mature, practical, proven, or appropriate for managing large quantities of mixed solid waste. <br />Significant permitting issues may prevent or significantly delay the implementation of any waste- <br />to- energy process. <br />1 http:// www. olver. com/ orangecounty/ PDF% 20files /Aftemative_Technologies_ Assessment , %20Orange %20County %20NC %208- 15 -08.pdf <br />Environmental Assessment — Paydarfar Site <br />3 September 30, 2009 <br />