Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
47 <br />DRAFT <br />224 with the lighting? <br />225 <br />226 Judith Wegner: For the UDO. In effect we may be halfway done with lighting for purposes for the UDO so if there a <br />227 pressing point to get some things in place but I don't want to dictate it. <br />228 <br />229 Michael Harvey: If is your intent to continue to review this in January. <br />230 <br />231 Judith Wegner: It doesn't have to come first. <br />232 <br />233 Larry Wright: It would be nice if it did. <br />234 <br />235 Judith Wegner: I don't know how the UDO will be organized. <br />236 <br />237 Michael Harvey: Because we are going to be recommending, as part of the UDO that all definitions be removed from <br />238 the ordinance in and of itself and put in a central definitions sections.. <br />239 <br />240 Judith Wegner: Which you will do last? <br />241 <br />242 Michael Harvey: No. We will look at those first. <br />243 <br />244 Mark Marcoplos: Just to clarify, we are still going to discuss all this but we are saying lets go along with this strategy of <br />245 discussing it and not worrying about the lumens. <br />246 <br />247 Michael Harvey: This board has come up with several suggestions and recommendations that will come back to you to <br />248 modify. The motion will fix the inconsistency I have of what is required to be submitted, start addressing the problem <br />249 and providing a graphic example of what we mean by a foot candle plan and an isometric data plan. <br />250 <br />251 Judith Wegner: I thought we were saying send attachment 1 forward and I thought we had gone through it line by line. <br />252 If there are additional revisions we may need to hold off until the main motion or else that will be the main motion <br />253 subject to amendments to revise the text. <br />254 <br />255 Brian Crawford: Are you revising the text? <br />256 <br />257 Judith Wegner: I have a feeling Mark wanted to move in that direction. <br />258 <br />259 Mark Marcoplos: This motion would take this and send it to the BOCC and we would not discuss it anymore? <br />260 <br />261 Judith Wegner: Right. <br />262 <br />263 Brian Crawford: When you say this, do you mean this one item? <br />264 <br />265 Mark Marcoplos: This while attachment number 1. <br />266 <br />267 Brian Crawford: We are only recommending this change. <br />268 <br />269 Mark Marcoplos: Everything is still on the table. <br />270 <br />271 Judith Wegner: Is there some concern we should go back over line byline what is underlined? I know we did that <br />272 before but maybe people have reviewed it further. <br />273 <br />274 Brian Crawford: I don't think we need to go back through. <br />275 <br />276 Mark Marcoplos: There are two things I have questions about that I can ask later. <br />277 <br />278 Craig: When we proceed with the UDO if there is a section that you have questions about that you advertise those <br />279. sections. <br />