Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-07-2009 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 12-07-2009
>
Agenda - 12-07-2009 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2009 10:00:06 AM
Creation date
12/4/2009 2:25:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/7/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20091207
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
ORD-2009-139 -An Ordinance Amending the Orange County Zoning Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2009
ORD-2009-139 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Relating to Outdoor Lighting
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ L <br />MINUTES <br />ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br />OCTOBER 7, 2009 <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />Approved lU4/09 <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: May Becker, At-Large Chapel Hill Township; Peter Hallenbeck, At-Large Cheeks Township; Mark <br />Marcoplos, At-Large Bingham Township; Earl McKee, Little River Township Representative; Jeffrey Schmitt, Cedar Grove <br />Township; Lany Wright, At-Large Cedar Grove Township; Rachel Phelps Hawkins, Hillsborough Representative; Tommy <br />McNeill, Eno Township Representative; Judith Wegner, Bingham Township <br />MEMBERS ABSENT: Brian Crawford, At-Large Eno Township (Chair); Mary Bobbitt-Cooke, Cheeks Township Representative; <br />Samantha Cabe, Chapel Hill Township; <br />STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Perdita Holtz, Planning Systems Coordinator; Tom Aftieri, Comprehensive <br />Planning Supervisor, Tina Love, Administrative Assistant II <br />OTHERS PRESENT: Sara ShiBIdS <br />AGENDA ITEM 7: ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT RELATING TO OUTDOOR LIGHTING • <br />To make a recommendation to the BOCC on this proposed text amendment hear4d at the August 24, <br />2009 Quarterly Public Hearing <br />Presenter.• Craig Benedict, Planning Director <br />(Handout from Lany Wright: "Suggestions: Amendments Relating to Outdoor Lighting") <br />Judith Wegner: This is something the Board of County Commissioners talked about at the Quarterly Public Hearing. One of the <br />issues was about athletic events where schools have the athletic fields and some comment from the citizens about lights and <br />cheering until and after 11:00 P.M. <br />Craig Benedict: The context of the interest of the Board of County Commissioners to readdress outdoor lighting has been due to <br />a few projects that have come up in the recent past. One was a farm Montessori school in a rural area and that would have <br />lights and the other had dealt with Lattisville Grove Baptist Church. We notice in our regulations, should there be different <br />standards for an urban area lighting standard versus a rural area lighting standard. We are giving direction that there should be <br />differences between the amount of lighting that is anticipated or intended in an urban area and a more restrictive standard in a <br />rural area both to intensity and timeframe. <br />Judith Wegner: Could you speak to the dark skies efforts by people who do not want the stars to get blotted out by too much <br />light. <br />Craig Benedict: About five years ago Orange County did a more recent revamping of its Outdoor Lighting ordinances to adhere <br />to some Dark Skies which is the organization that has interest in limiting light pollution so people can observe the stars, sky and <br />planets at night. We made the first cut in 2003-2004 to suggest fixtures that are more cut off and lights don't spill out. We have <br />been working with the electric companies to have some of their fixtures to adhere to these standards. We made the first cut and <br />realized we did have standards that were one size fits all and then we took a look at the Dark Skies more recent thoughts and <br />incorporated those thoughts into this. On page 19, I will now go through the outdoor lighting standards. There was a <br />presentation in February of this year. We hope to proceed with this tonight or in November. If it is moved to November it would <br />be more problematic for you to approve the minutes, we'd have to do it by some sort of email vote which we don't like to do. <br />Earl McKee: Have you notated any sections that were questioned in that public hearing? <br />Craig Benedict: I have a recollection about the property line. The definitions on page 19, 20 and 21 remain the same. <br />Rachel Phelps Hawkins: I have a question about security lights. What about people who have security lights in their yards that <br />are on all the time? <br />Craig Benedict: They would prefer a new one. They have new standards so the lighting stays within the property and will not <br />overflow. Any existing lighting was grandfathered in. In 2004 when we passed the ordinance, we had suggested an amortization <br />schedule for people to change things out after eight to ten years. There is also a note there could be more changes in this <br />ordinance but we will wait to hear your framework built. Then we will definitely and prioritize how to make additional <br />amendments to this. Security lighting is allowed and lights that have sensors. <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.