Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />I7 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />15 <br /> <br />Triangle Area RPO -> DCHC MPO <br />Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Long Range Transportation Plan, <br />Transportation Improvement Program, STPDA, CMAQ, Enhancements, Etc. <br />Funding for Planning Organizations <br />o The DCHC MPO would not receive additional funding for planning because <br />MPO funding is based on the Urbanized Area <br />o After the 2010 Census, the Triangle Area RPO would lose approximately $1 <br />for every 10 people (about $700) <br />Next Steps <br />- TAC has asked staff to initiate expansion in western Orange County. <br />- Solicit feedback from Orange County Board of Commissioners. <br />- TAC will review expansion at their December 9, 2009 meeting. <br />Ellen Beckman said that they would like to receive feedback by December 9th <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked why the Chatham County Commissioners did not want to <br />participate and Ellen Beckman said that they wanted to delay any expansion until the 2010 <br />census came out. Some of the population projections in Chatham are based off of planning <br />decisions that the previous board had made. The new board is trying to reverse some of these <br />decisions. The Chatham County Board of Commissioners is hesitant to say that all of the area <br />is urbanizing. She said that every time the census comes out, this will be reevaluated. <br />Commissioner Pelissier asked for colored maps of these areas. She said that if Orange <br />County chose to wait until the 2010 census, then the area might be required to come under an <br />MPO. The issue would be whether it would come under the Burlington MPO or under the <br />DCHC MPO. She asked how this would be decided. <br />Karen Lincoln said that there could be more coordination between these organizations. <br />Ellen Beckman said that the urbanized areas pick up the contiguous block groups that <br />are above 500-1000 persons per square mile. It depends on where the growth is and what <br />transportation corridors connect it. It could be picked up by either MPO. <br />Commissioner Pelissier said that this was discussed at the last RPO meeting and she is <br />the liaison to the Triangle Area RPO. She said that there was discussion about waiting until <br />2010. She said that a point was raised that this would cut the RPO Planning Area in the <br />middle. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the population in the Orange County RPO and the <br />Chatham County RPO and the CMAQ money that might be available. <br />Karen Lincoln said that the issue with the CMAQ money is that the County would still be <br />eligible through the MPO, but there is a competitive process. In the TARPO, there is an <br />agreement to split it proportionately, according to the population. According to the calculations, <br />Orange County would be eligible for about $77,000 in CMAQ money, but would have to have <br />eligible projects. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that the primary issue for Orange County is whether it wants <br />to do transportation planning for this urbanizing area. This would include Buckhorn Village and <br />other areas that are important to Orange County. There is no representation of Orange County <br />on the Burlington-Graham MPO. Her recommendation is to do the expansion now. <br />Commissioner Yuhasz asked how much area would be taken in and staff did not know. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that this seems like an excellent example of total lack of <br />communication with the Burlington/Graham MPO and there is no idea about its plans. He <br />