Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />12 <br /> <br />1. Approve the ongoing plan as proposed by Emergency Services to strategically locate <br />EMS stations as call loads determine the need and resources provide; and <br />2. Authorize Emergency Services and Asset Management and Purchasing Services to <br />proceed with the immediate plan to refurbish the Revere Road site for an EMS station; <br />and <br />3. Authorize Asset Management and Purchasing Services to provide to the BOCC a plan <br />to divest 1914 New Hope Church Road following refurbishment of 304 Revere Road <br />and re-location by EMS; and <br />4. Authorize the continuation of the project contingent upon necessary permits and <br />approvals from the Town of Hillsborough; and <br />5. Approve funds up to $50,000 from the Emergency Services Reserve Capital Project. <br />The Financial Services Department will bring forward a budget amendment, as well as <br />a Capital Project Ordinance, for acceptance at an upcoming Board of Commissioners' <br />meeting. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />b. Expansion of Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Area Boundary <br />The Board received a presentation from Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan <br />Planning Organization staff and considered directing staff on preparing a response. <br />Transportation Planner Karen Lincoln presented this item. <br />BACKGROUND: The TAC (Transportation Advisory Committee) of the DCHC MPO, at its <br />November 17, 2009 meeting, directed Lead Planning Agency (LPA) staff to initiate the process <br />to expand the Metropolitan Area Boundary (MAB) in western Orange County along the I-40/I-85 <br />corridor, and to get feedback from Orange County. Attachment 1 is a letter from the TAC <br />requesting Orange County's response to the proposed expansion of the MAB. Attachment 2 Is <br />a map showing the proposed MAB expansion. <br />The DCHC MPO is investigating expansion at this time because the MPO is beginning the <br />process of developing the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) that will list the <br />highway, transit, fixed-guideway, bicycle and other transportation services and facilities that are <br />planned for construction through year 2040. Federal legislation requires that an MPO's <br />metropolitan area boundary contain, at a minimum, the entire Urbanized Area (UZA), as defined <br />by the U.S. Census, and should contain the area beyond the UZA that is expected to be <br />urbanized within the next twenty years or that is affected by urban policies and influence. <br />Attachments 5 and 6 prepared by the LPA in 2006 are respectively a Background and History of <br />DCHC MPO Membership and MAB and Frequently Asked Questions. <br />Expansion of the DCHC MAB will take in a portion of Orange County that is in the Triangle <br />Rural Planning Organization (TARPO), separating the northern portion of the County's rural <br />transportation planning area from the southern part of the rural transportation planning area. <br />Expanding the DCHC MAB into an area of Orange County currently in TARPO would result in a <br />loss of NCDOT planning funds equal to $1 per every 10 people removed from the TARPO <br />planning area. The local match could decrease, stay the same or increase. The NCDOT <br />required local match of 20% is divided equally among the four participating counties, so each <br />