Agenda - 12-07-2009 - 4a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 free electricity from methane generated by the landfill. It could be the beginning of an eco- industrial park. There is space in the EDDs and an Economic Development Department that is in need of a mission. Spence Dickerson said that his farm, Spence's Farm, is right down the road from one of the potential sites of a waste transfer station and he has had over 10,000 children visit his farm over the past ten years. He said that it is important to have agriculture in Orange County and to site a WTS in this area is not right. He said that the County needs to protect this land. He suggested using the waste as an economic development resource. Joanne Mitchell is a sewer customer of Orange County and she is against the increase in the sewer rates in the Efland area. She said that last budget year, the community presented to the Board of County Commissioners a petition with over 200 signatures a few months ago that were in disagreement with the unfair increase and now they are back. She said that most customers would not qualify for financial help from DSS with their sewer bills. She said that this is not an Efland problem, but it is an Orange County problem. She said that the community would continue to meet and gather support and seek funding sources and education on how to support this system. Robert Campbell is President of the Rogers-Eubanks Road Neighborhood Association. He said that there is a 75% increase in the amount of buzzards swarming around the landfill this year. He said that they were told by the Solid Waste Director that it was the citizens' responsibility and he checked with the State, and the State representatives said that it was the Solid Waste Director's responsibility to make a recommendation for something to be done about the buzzards. He said that the citizens cannot do anything about the air quality and the stench from the landfill, but the County Commissioners can ask the State to come out and monitor this landfill. He said that he is concerned about the quality of health and life in this community. He said that the citizens are tired. He said that the County has won awards, but no humanitarian awards. He asked when the lies would stop and the truth would be revealed. Christopher Vaughn talked about Option 2, Version 3 of the Orange-Alamance County line dispute. He said that this latest version includes annexing legitimate Orange County properties that were never in dispute. Specifically, this includes the Orange County park section of Mill Creek subdivision. They are Orange County residents that live in the park and do not want to be forced to change their county that they physically and legitimately lie in. He said that the annexation of Orange County Mill Creek was done so on the recommendation of the Mill Creek Owner's Association and the Mebane City Council. He said that arguments presented for this center on the lack of direct County access between the park and the rest of Orange County. If this were the qualification for county line redistricting, then all properties meeting the standard should be changing counties. He said that the primary reason for annexing Mill Creek is money. The land developer, the owner's association, and some residents are motivated to move Orange County land into Alamance County for the lower tax rate, in hopes that it will increase lot sales and Mill Creek Homeowner's Association coffers. Mill Creek has 96 unsold lots, but less than 25 of those are in Orange County. He said that each of these groups is conspiring to use a political opportunity to usurp the private property rates through imminent domain. If Mill Creek is allowed to do this, it will set a precedent that anyone can change the undisputed county line if they can organize and pay to survey it. He asked the County Commissioners to please keep the County line where it is for current and future Orange County and Alamance County property owners. b. Matters on the Printed Agenda (These matters were considered when the Board addressed that item on the agenda below.)