Browse
Search
ORD-2009-144 Application of Dimensional Requirements to Establish Regulation Governing the Development of Drive-thru Facilities within the County–Option Two-Regulation
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2009
>
ORD-2009-144 Application of Dimensional Requirements to Establish Regulation Governing the Development of Drive-thru Facilities within the County–Option Two-Regulation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 10:25:34 AM
Creation date
12/3/2009 4:09:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/6/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-06-2009 - 5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 10-06-2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
103 <br />Affecting the development of drive - through facilities currently Is controlled through the <br />zoning process and limitation of conditional use permits, which is exclusively under the <br />control of cities and counties. Hence, this type of control measure may be difficult to <br />implement on a regional, statewide, or national basis. <br />Equity considerations are an issue that has arisen in pastpublic policy debates over the <br />possible limitation of drive - through facilities. Is it fair to remove existing, already ap- <br />proved and operating drive- up.facilities? Conversely, is it fair to ban or even limit new <br />drive -up facilities and allow existing services to continue to operate? <br />The following implementation guidelines can be summarized; <br />• Controls on vehicle operations are probably most effectively implemented at the <br />state level. <br />• Contiols on development are the province of local jurisdictions. In this case, regional <br />and state agencies fan play a valuable technical assistance role. <br />• Controls on drive - through facilities generally are most effective as limitations rather <br />than outright bans. <br />• Design standards represent an appropriate implementation mechanism, based on <br />congestion as well as emission considerations. <br />• Data should be collected prior to enactment of any measure so as to establish the <br />magnitude of existing idling emissions that'would be impacted. <br />• Controls on extended idling of vehicles will impact existing businesses as well as the <br />public. It is important that representatives of both groups be actively involved iP the <br />planning, analysis, and development of any such controls. As evidenced by the <br />history of the proposed California legislation on heavy -duty vehicle idling, imple- <br />mentation prospects can be enhanced by actively involving potentially impacted <br />business interests in the development of proposed control measures. <br />IN Bibliography. <br />1. Guensler, Randall, Daniel Sperling, and Paul Jovanis, "Uncertainty in the Emission <br />Inventory for Heavy�Duty Diesel Powered Trucks", report prepared for the TRED <br />Foundation, Sacramento, California; Institute of Transportation Studies, University <br />of California, Davis, Research Report No. UCD- 115 -RR- 91.02, June 1991. <br />2 Guidelines for Local Air Districts Considering Transportation Control Measures <br />Directed at Heavy -Truck Operations ", report prepared by the AB2595 Technical <br />Advisory Group Established pursuant to the California Clean Air Act (Assembly Bill <br />rstradal Vditcltldliq 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.