Orange County NC Website
14 <br />Craig Benedict said that this has been going on since 2002. When he came to Orange <br />County in 1999, the Planning Department was asked to do an inventory of all billboards along 1- <br />85/1-40 in Orange County. He said that when Carolina Advertising was leasing billboards from <br />Mr. Lloyd, the signs were unlit. It was determined that since the signs were unlit, that letting <br />them be lit would be an expansion of a non - conforming use. He said that in cases where DOT <br />has rules, they probably preempt local zoning, but where DOT rules are silent, then Orange <br />County zoning may take effect. DOT is silent on the issue of signs not being lit for more than <br />180 days, but it is in Orange County's rules. <br />Commissioner Yuhasz asked that if the County Commissioners went with Option 2 — to <br />bring Orange County's regulations into compliance with the DOT regulations — and if this would <br />allow any new billboards and Craig Benedict said no. <br />Commissioner Hemminger asked for an explanation of why the signs cannot be lit and <br />Craig Benedict said that the County has an outdoor lighting ordinance and new permitted lights <br />in the major transportation corridor cannot have lit signs. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked for an explanation of the chart (Matrix of highway <br />billboards). Craig Benedict said that, of the 31 signs, Orange County and DOT were consistent <br />on 27 of those. On four of the sites, there is a dispute about whether DOT thought that the <br />signs could be relit and whether Orange County thought that they were unlit for more than 180 <br />days. Mr. Lloyd's signs are #'s 15 and 16. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that it is important not to single out Mr. Lloyd. He said that it <br />seems like this is not in the context of why the County did what it did originally with billboards. <br />He made reference to a handout from Durham City in reference to billboards and said that this <br />was a 40 -page document and everything after page 8 is about digital signs. He made reference <br />to page 4 about billboards in Durham. He would like to see Orange County's ordinance and <br />have a better understanding of why Orange County did what it did before making a change. He <br />hopes that the owners of the four signs agree to conform to the County's standards, regardless <br />of DOT's standards. He would like to be fair to Mr. Lloyd, but he would also like to be cautious <br />in making a decision. <br />Commissioner Yuhasz said that caution is in order but he does not think this is about <br />whether Orange County lighting standards should apply to billboards. He said that the real <br />question is whether or not any Orange County standards can apply to existing billboards that <br />come under DOT's purview as a result of the State of North Carolina's agreement with the <br />federal government. He said that the argument is that Orange County regulations are <br />preempted. He said that the County should acknowledge that it will comply with the state and <br />federal regulations. He said that it will have no affect on the current billboards and the number <br />in the County. He said that this is only looking at four billboards. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Yuhasz, seconded by Commissioner Hemminger <br />to direct Planning staff to prepare an amendment to the applicable portion of the County's <br />zoning ordinance to eliminate certain types of regulation of lighting of billboards where the <br />regulation is in conflict with State or Federal Law. This would not exempt all billboards from <br />regulation, nor would it open the door for more billboards to be erected. It would, however, bring <br />Orange County's ordinance into compliance with existing State and /or Federal Law. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he would still like more information and he thinks that it <br />is reasonable to request that if someone is going to light a billboard and the County does have a <br />legal standing to oppose it, that the County can at least try and negotiate that the applicant <br />conform to Orange County's lighting standards. He said that DOT's standards are not as <br />progressive as Orange County's standards. He does not want to apologize for being more <br />progressive. He thinks that the Board needs to understand how the County got here, regardless <br />of this situation. <br />