Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-17-2009 - 6d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 11-17-2009
>
Agenda - 11-17-2009 - 6d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2009 12:44:33 PM
Creation date
11/13/2009 12:44:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/17/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20091117
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br />PAST EFFORTS AT SOLUTIUNS <br />L;ff-orts have: been made fly local governments to address the extensi~}n of'ptif~lic ti~ater <br />and see;er systems in the general area. of the Solid ~~'aste Landfill. Several factors make <br />the further extension. of these pub}ic facilities both unlikelti and prohibitively etipensive: <br />1. ~l`his is a sparser populated area impacting upon the cost per customer serviced <br />'~. Iv1an~ ofthese residential units are on large tracts of land located soma: distance front <br />public rights of v4~ay meaning the cost of extending lines across private propert}~ could ~e <br />a hurdle to providing sere tees <br />~. These areas border or tixist in portions of the county where by a~reemcnt public <br />utilities extensions may be prohibited. <br />~. Them may be issues associated ~~~ith the continuing monthly user tests to households <br />for obtaining these public, utility services and paving for them. <br />>, E3ased on the age of'structures and phtmbing fixtures within, service pressures from <br />public tivater systems could require either pressure reducing equipment or replacement of <br />plumbing within impacted structures. <br />6, Potential ft~r rezoning, land use changes or the subdivision. of larger parcels could. <br />impact the location i~1~ti~fhere utilities are to be extended. <br />~, '1"he Solid Waste Enterprise Fund is committed to fund the on-going maintenance of <br />the irtndfill fc7r a period of thirty (3(}} ~ gars post closure. ~I~IIt: S~'ll~~ can not pro~~icle <br />significantly large outlay of funding. to support construction of an extensive public ~v°ater <br />and se«~er system for the area surrounding the landf`t~ll. <br />3. Other issues. <br />YARAI~IETF.I2S OF A i~Q FAULf)~ WE:LI, REPAIR FLIi~D 1'OLt~Y <br />Similar in concept. to the polio}• established. in 2(}p? referenced above a well repair fund <br />could be established that would be funded via revenues generated by the Solid ~~'astc <br />operations It is important that these issues be addressed sooner than later in that the <br />actual operation of the landfill is scheduled to end within a short period of time. After <br />that time, depending upon the course of action authorized by the Orange Count}< Board of <br />Commissioners, the revenue stream that supports the landfill operation ma}~ be drastically <br />reduced. White. the participating towns and county remain liable for the long term <br />aspects of'the landfills maintenance: for ~0 years after the landfill closes, budgetary <br />constraints could impact upon positive responses to addressing these issues in the future. <br />ICthe Board ofC`ommissioners supports this approach to addressing the well problems o <br />residents tivithit~ an impact area {30(}O feet of the landfill's boundary:} of the existing <br />landfill operation, staff can forn~ulate the policy; meet with the Iandtill partners to assure <br />concurrence,. and, once approved by the Board of Commissioners initiatE contact with <br />reside nts ~~ ithitx the impact area served by a non public water supply.. <br />In i;ach case:, the County Public l le;alth Department ~~'ould be involved in testing. the wells <br />and confirming the need for repair. Inmost cases, the County`s effort would focus on <br />repair c>r replaeeanent of an ~tistin~,~ ~~ell. Il~, site conciitit~ns and or other eonditic~ns do <br />not allow #~or a repair ar r~;placemelit of Fui existing failed (failing} residential w'e11. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.