Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-17-2009 - 6b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 11-17-2009
>
Agenda - 11-17-2009 - 6b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2009 12:37:54 PM
Creation date
11/13/2009 12:37:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/17/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20091117
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
23 <br />~.:Attaclmerit:5:: <br />2006 Review of MPO Membership and <br />Metropolitan Area Boundary <br />September 11, 2006 <br />The Federal Highway Act of 19b2 initiated a requirement that a continuing, cooperative, <br />and comprehensive (" 3-C") transportation planning process be established for all urban <br />areas over 50,000 in population in order to qualify for federal transportation funds. These <br />urban transportation planning requirements have been administered by the North Carolina <br />Department of Transportation (NCDOT) with the approval of Federal Highway <br />Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration {FTA) of the U. S. <br />Department of Transportation (USDOT). <br />There are now 17 urban areas in North Carolina which participate in the " 3-C" <br />transportation planning process, including; Asheville, Burlington, Charlotte-Union, <br />Durham, Fayetteville, Gastonia, Goldsboro, Greensboro, Greenville, Hickory, High <br />Point, Jacksonville, Kannapolis, Raleigh, Rocky Mount, Wilmington, and Winston- <br />Sa(em. Nearly all of these urban areas also include one or more neighboring smaller <br />municipalities. <br />When the Durham Urbanized Area was first designated by the Census in 1970, it <br />consisted of only the City of Durham and a portion of Durham County. The first <br />Transportation Advisory Committee was created for the Durham Urbanized Area in the <br />1970s. The 1980 Census expanded the Durham Urbanized Area to include the Towns of <br />Chapel Hill and Carrboro and portions of Orange County. Consequently, those <br />governments were added and the name changed to the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro <br />Urban Area MPO. The Town of Hillsborough and northeastern Chatham County were <br />added in 1994 in response to the need for coordinated planning in the area and the <br />requirements ofthe federal transportation bill 1STEA. <br />1n 1993, the US EPA requested that Butner join the DCHC MPO because of the common <br />air quality issues in Dutchville Township in southwestern Granville County. At the time, <br />the DCHC MPO declined extending MPO membership to Butner. 1n 2004, the DCHC <br />MPO approached Orange County, Roxboro, Person County, Butner, Granville County, <br />Pittsboro, and Chatharri County in regard to MPO expansion. At the time, the DCHC <br />MPO decided not to expand because the 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) <br />for the MPO was well under way and expansion would delay the plan. The TAC directed <br />the MPO staff to reexamine MPO expansion at the beginning of the 2035 LRTP update. <br />Over time, the role of MPOs has shifted. Historically, Lang-range transportation plans <br />(sometimes called Thoroughfare Plans) for this area, and indeed for most urban areas in .. <br />the State, have traditionally focused on highways. Automobile travel is the dominant <br />form of transportation, with transit accounting for less than ten percent of all trips. 1n the <br />past, land use development has encouraged campus-like employment centers away from <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.