Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-05-2009 - 6a (2)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 11-05-2009
>
Agenda - 11-05-2009 - 6a (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 2:04:01 PM
Creation date
11/5/2009 12:58:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/5/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20091105
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
32 <br />1 Farmers inviting the public to their operation as part of agritourism may need liability insurance <br />2 to protect them from potential visitor injury. Agricultural buildings that are typically exempt <br />3 from the North Carolina Building Code may become subject to code if they are open to the <br />4 public. Farmers may need to provide restroom and hand washing facilities, which can translate <br />5 into larger septic systems and new wells. Food sales may bring other environmental health <br />6 regulations into play. All of these items can be addressed, but they can take time and may <br />7 require professionally- prepared construction drawings or site plans. These items- may. seem - <br />8 tedious but it is important for farmers to comply and when possible exceed requirements to <br />9 visibly maintain their role as environmental stewards. As residential development begins to <br />10 crowd traditional farming communities, the installation of proper environmental health <br />11 measures will become increasingly important to ensure the future compatibility of farms as <br />12 good neighbors. <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />Taxes <br />Agricultural Surveys from 1998 to the present day list property taxes as a substantial and <br />problematic expense for local farmers. 79% of the farmers who responded to the 1998 survey <br />said that they participated in the Present -Use Value Taxation Program. The tax program is <br />probably the single most effective program for keeping farms, particularly conventional farms, <br />in operation and out of development. But the farm tax rate cannot keep pace with the <br />increasing land costs brought on by residential growth, it cannot help new farmers buy land nor <br />compete with the incentive for retiring farmers to sell their land to non - agricultural interests. <br />Property taxes remain a key area where many farmers feel more help is needed. 70% of <br />farmers stated in the 1998 agricultural survey that taxes are a strong factor in profitability. <br />More than 75% said that they would like to see a reduction in taxes on farm machinery and <br />Draft 1012812009 Challenges to Agriculture 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.