Orange County NC Website
738 <br />MINUTES <br />ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF CDMP~ISSIONER5 <br />NOVEP16ER 27, 1978 <br />The Board of County Commissioners and the Orange County Planning board conducted .. <br />a public hearing on Monday, November 27, 1978 at 7:30 p.m., in the Superior Court <br />Room of the Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. <br />Commissioners present: Mr. Richard l~lhitted, Chairman; Mr, Donald lJillhoit, <br />Mr. Norman Walker and Mr. Norman Gustaveson. Ms. Anne Barnes, Commissioner Elect, <br />attended the public hearing. Commissioner Jan Pinney was absent. <br />Planning Board members present: Dr. Robert Bonar, Chairman; Dr. Logan Ervin, <br />Mr. Art Cleary, Mr. Lindsay Ef1and, Ms. Jean Anderson, Mr. Robert freer, Mr. John <br />Scarlett and Mr. Andrew Dobelstein.and Ms. Hazel Lunsi`ord. <br />Mr. Richard Whitted called the meeting to order. He asked for discussion <br />of the amendments to the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. He said the <br />amendments had been to public hearing, had been recommended by the Planning Board <br />and were awaiting final action by the Board of County Commissioners. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson asked whether the amendments would add better planning <br />and administrative procedures or better legal clarification to the present regulations. <br />Dr. Bonar said some of the changes slightly modified technical procedures and <br />others primarily clarified points in the present subdivision regulations. <br />For copy of subdivision amendments, see page 790 of this book. <br />Dr. Bonar said section III-A-2 clarifies the nature of the planning staff review -. <br />of proposed subdivision before consideration by the Planning Board. It also spells <br />out the question of exemptions in rare cases. He said section III-A-4 clarifies <br />the question of appeal. Section III-C-1 gives the right to appeal to the Commissioners <br />decisions of the Planning Board on minor subdivisions. <br />The Planning Director told the Boards that section III-A-2 places the responsibility <br />of determining exemptions upon the planning staff and the planning staff currently <br />makes this decision under the present ordinance without difficulty. He felt this <br />section shifted the purpose of subdivision from the subdivider to the planning staff. <br />The County Attorney said sections III-A-2 and III-A-3 incorporate two different <br />ideas. One is the decision making process in determining whether a subdivision is <br />exempt under the statutes and the other is a special exemption idea in a proposed <br />subdivision when no sale is intended immediately. He suggested keeping a permanent <br />record which would show which subdivisions were exempt and why. . <br />The Planning Director said a key problem is determining who will use the land <br />and when they will use the land. He said currently, ~vhen a subdivision act occurs, <br />the planning staff assumes land will be developed and'will fall under subdivision <br />regulations. He felt sections III-A-2, III-A-3 and III-A-4 were unnecessary. <br />Commissioner Whitted called for the public hearing to convene and turned the <br />meeting over to Dr. Bonar, Chairman of the Planning Board. . <br />Agenda Item 2: Public Hearin to Consider Rezonin 1.15 Acres <br />of Land Dwned by Raymond Williams from Residential <br />to general Commercial <br />The Planning Director told the audience Mr. Raymond's property was located on <br />Highway 86, south of Blackwood Station, contains a metal structure on the southern <br />end, has septic tank, individual well and pole electricity. He said all property <br />