Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-20-2009 - 6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 10-20-2009
>
Agenda - 10-20-2009 - 6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2009 9:40:56 AM
Creation date
10/20/2009 9:40:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/20/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20091020
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />Planning Director Craig Benedict and Assistant County Kevin Lindley have met directly with <br />EPA officials in Region 4 in Atlanta and DENR representatives in Raleigh over the last three <br />weeks to bring this phase of the process to fruition. <br />DENR reports that its review and letter of recommendation to the EPA is scheduled within 10 <br />days. The review notes an environmental Categorical Exclusion (CE), which should allow the <br />project to move more expeditiously at the next stage (i.e. EPA grant award and then back to <br />DENR for construction plans and specs permit review). This construction plan review has been <br />concurrent with the environmental review. <br />In the meeting on September 29, 2009 with DENR officials, Assistant County Manager Willie <br />Best, Craig Benedict and Kevin Lindley offered the likelihood of state revolving loan fund (SRF) <br />monies to complete both projects not covered by the EPA grant. <br />As noted in the March 2008 BOCC abstract from County Engineer Paul Thames(now retired), <br />additional monies would be necessary to complete the projects beyond the EPA grant and <br />County allocated funds. The EPA grant is a 55% match and the SRF can be used for the local <br />match. SRF fund repayment is not until the projects are complete, which will allow for a better <br />horizon for debt capacity. The projects are scheduled for completion in late 2012. As a <br />reminder, Central Efland sewer systems will be pumped to the Town of Hillsborough per an <br />existing agreement and North Buckhorn sewer systems flow to the City of Mebane. <br />County monies can be used for easement acquisition, engineering fees and an upgrade to the <br />existing McGowan Creek Sewage Lift Station (part of the existing Central Efland sewer system) <br />which was not included in the CJT engineering design work for Central Efland sewer extensions. <br />EPA grant monies were suggested by EPA to be focused on construction activities. <br />Buckhorn EDD -Mebane Coordination <br />This information relates to the continued utility planning with the City of Mebane consistent with <br />the March 1, 2004 Orange County/City of Mebane Utility Service Area Agreement. Specifically, <br />the agreement includes the City of Mebane's agreement for utility extension by private/public <br />entities into an approximate 1,000-acre EDD area. However, there were not specific allocations <br />reserved for that area that would help Orange County obtain certified business site status by the <br />State. In addition, utility design planning has not been completed to illustrate how an orderly <br />plan of development could occur and/or how an anchor development such as Buckhorn Village <br />could support the utility master plan for the larger Buckhorn EDD. <br />To this end, Orange County, City of Mebane, Buckhorn Road Associates and its engineering <br />consultants (Summit Engineers) embarked on a conceptual investigation to find out; <br />a. what needs to be done, <br />b. in what sequence <br />c. for what design costs, and <br />d. eventual construction cost. <br />See Attachment 3 which shows preliminary ideas. <br />As this information is refined, this topic will come back to the BOCC for discussion. The <br />apportionment of funds to complete certain phases will be the subject of upcoming <br />conversations. Utility work of this nature would likely be handled by a developer's agreement <br />(DA) recently authorized by 2005 state legislation and/or interlocal agreements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.