Browse
Search
Minutes - 19780925
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1970's
>
1978
>
Minutes - 19780925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 11:38:41 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:25:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/25/1978
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
719 <br />Commissioner Willhoit said he did not believe it worthwhile to try to nickel and <br />dime the contract down. It looks like it is 1/2 million aver our estimates. If <br />there is a chance to get more competitive bids, maybe we should ga out for bids <br />again. <br />Ben Lloyd asked if he understood Commissioner Willhoit to say it would cast <br />1/2 million over what was budgeted given time lapse. He was told the original <br />estimate was $1,24p,000 and the bid now is $2,049,000. Mr. Lloyd asked, "Why <br />the drastic increase?" "Has the time lapse caused this increase?" <br />Commissioner. Walker answered, "Inaccurate initial cost estimate, plus time <br />lapse and a whole lot of other things." <br />f1r. Nassif said it would take three weeks to get new bids. <br />Commissioner Willhoit laid he was not interested in considering $2,000,000 and <br />would like to pursue the idea of getting bids from contractors who did not bid. <br />He mentioned things that might 6e changed, such as elevators, and the coordination <br />of a central intake for Social Services and Health instead of each having their own <br />reception rooms. <br />Commissioner Pinney observed this project would take all the money the county <br />had, leaving nothing for the jail. <br />The County Manager asked if the county could rebid for one building and Mr. <br />Nassif replied it could. <br />Commissioner Walker said renovation of Grady Brown would save money but new <br />construction might be cheaper in the long run. He said the Board should start <br />looking into the option of new construction which might save more money, energy <br />and be more convenient for the community in the long run. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson asked that this issue be put on the third Tuesday <br />agenda in October to discuss options available in terms of rebidding. <br />Commissioner Walker was excused from the rest of the meeting. <br />Agenda Item 5: Industrial Development Revenue Bond_Authority <br />The County Attorney introduced Ms. Jane Curtis with the North Carolina Department <br />of Commerce. Ms. Curtis told the Board that industrial revenue bonds are fairly ne~•~ <br />in North Carolina. The state requires certain legislative findings that assures <br />industry using this procedure provides enough jobs to have an impact on the <br />community, pays high than average wages and shows certification of financial <br />responsibility. Industry cannot abandon another location in North Carolina and use <br />these bonds to construct new plants. Interest on these bonds is exempt from state <br />and federal income taxes, thus, lower rates are available to the user. <br />Ms. Curtis stated there were five steps involved in bonding: 1) initial meeting <br />with financing authority, 2) approval in principal by Department of Commerce, <br />3) public notice, 4) review period and 5) final approval by Department of Commerce <br />after judicial review. <br />The county is in no way responsible for repayment if the user defaults. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson asked if it were necessary to have a company waiting <br />before forming a financing authority.. <br />Ms. Curtis responded that some authorities were formed beforehand while others <br />were created when needed. <br />The County Finance Director said there had been same question initially that <br />companies needing this type of financing were of lower financial quality. <br />Ms. Curtis responded that the credit worthiness for this type bonding had to <br />be better than the typical bank or other lending institution normally required. <br />The County Attorney said the necessary step the Board Should take if interested <br />would be to direct him to get in touch with bonding counsel with the idea of pre- <br />paring a resolution of intent. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.