Browse
Search
ORD-2008-012 - Orange Co Zoning Ordinance -Buckhorn Rd Associates LLC Rezoning
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2008
>
ORD-2008-012 - Orange Co Zoning Ordinance -Buckhorn Rd Associates LLC Rezoning
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2013 8:45:29 AM
Creation date
10/14/2009 4:31:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/25/2008
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
c1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
85. Yes, there are 84,000+ people on the highway going south and north, but they're not all <br />getting off the exit at the same time. There are already traffic issues. I can't get out of my <br />driveway if I wait after 11:00 on Saturday and Sunday. I have to wait 20-30 minutes to exit out <br />of my driveway as it is. If this development comes in, it might be longer than that. During busy <br />shopping season, Thanksgiving and Christmas, I'd have to stay in my house all day long. The <br />truck stop is already enough traffic. The flea market is too much traffic. There is a taco stand <br />across the street from my house that causes chaos early in the morning. There's loud music <br />early in the morning until late afternoon. I do not have peace and quiet now. If this <br />development comes in, it will be worse than what it already is now. Like I said, to touch on the <br />weighing station; the weighing station is right there going northbound if you get on the interstate. <br />Saturdays and Sundays there's already problems that the trucks have to merge to get in the <br />weighing station. No one touched on how that's going to back up Buckhorn and 70 from both <br />ends from people trying to get on northbound 85. <br />Tom Darnell: I'm an Orange County landowner. I have two questions and one comment. The <br />gentleman mentioned a national, unnamed tenant. What if they lose the tenant? Do they lose <br />the budget? Would all of this work be in vain? The second thing, there was an amendment, I <br />got this on the Internet, they added a couple of acres, which an acre and a half of it adjoins my <br />property and it's on the east side of Buckhorn. What are they going to do if it wasn't addressed? <br />The acre and a half that was not even mentioned, but it's going to be zoned the same as the <br />west side, and it absolutely adjoins my property. That affects me, and I don't mind it, I just <br />would like to know what their intentions are with that property. The third thing that wasn't <br />addressed when the firemen were here -they're asking for six-story buildings. A five-story <br />building is as far as a ground ladder will go. They'll need a ladder truck and you're going to <br />have to come up with about $1 million for a ladder truck. Some company, either Mebane or <br />Efland is going to have to maintain that ladder truck. I don't know if anyone has thought about <br />that. If they donate a place for a fire station, well that's the place it needs to be. The last <br />comment is that I've owned the land for ten years or so, but since 1981 or so, you or your <br />predecessors have worked diligently to put approximately 600 or 900 acres in an EDD and told <br />everybody that it's going to be economic development. If not these guys, next week there will <br />be somebody else. This is not going to stop. Basically, I'm for it, because the next one will be <br />right down the street. If they leave and don't get the approval, six months from now we'll be <br />back in here for another go. So, you can control with all your rules and regulations and come up <br />with something good, but they are coming because you've already told them, "Here's our EDD." <br />Chair Jacobs: Can someone answer the question about the property adjoining Mr. Darnell's. <br />Jim Parker: I believe the property he is referring to is a piece of property that resides on the <br />west side and the east side of Buckhorn Road and is not two separate parcels; it is one parcel <br />that is connected. The portion of that parcel on the west side, which is shaped somewhat like <br />an "L", we anticipate that that will be used for access in some form or fashion to Rabbit Drive <br />and/or the Petro. <br />Chair Jacobs: I don't know if you can or want to answer the question about what happens if <br />you don't get the anchor tenant. <br />Jim Parker: We keep trying. That's my answer. <br />End of public comment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.